White v. Fitzpatrick, 343 U.S. 928 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
White v. Fitzpatrick, 343 U.S. 928 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Paramount Pictures Corporation Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Avco Embassy Pictures Corp. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. United Artists Corporation Buena Vista Distributing Co., Inc., Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation, Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation (ca9, 1988-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Paramount Pictures Corporation Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation Universal Film Exchanges, Inc. Warner Bros. Distributing Corp. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. Avco Embassy Pictures Corp. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. United Artists Corporation Buena Vista Distributing Co., Inc., Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company United Artists Theatres, Inc. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation, Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. Daniel E. Harkins, Individually and Dba Tower Plaza Cinema I and II v. General Cinema Corporation, and the Harry Nace Company American Multi-Cinema, Inc. United Artists Corporation
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Since consistently bad business judgment is not to be expected from able and experienced corporate decisionmakers, only the conspiratorial inference is plausible. 52 Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Co., 672 F.2d 485, 501 (5th Cir.1982) (appendix--district court analysis); see Milgram v. Loew's, Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 583 (3d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952). 53 Harkins attempts to raise a triable issue of fact regarding the quality of its bids by comparing the terms it offered with those of the licensed split member for forty top-grossing film…
discussed Cited "see" Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
Southway Theatres, Inc. v. Georgia Theatre Co., 672 F.2d 485, 501 (5th Cir.1982) (appendix — district court analysis); see Milgram v. Loew’s, Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 583 (3d Cir.1951), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952).
discussed Cited "see" Delaware Valley Marine Supply Co. v. American Tobacco Co.
3rd Cir. · 1961 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milgram v. Loew’s Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 585 (3 Cir. 1951), cert. denied 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952). . 66 F.Supp. 323 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1946), modified 334 U.S. 131 , 68 S.Ct. 915 , 92 L.Ed. 1260 (1948), on remand 85 F.Supp. 881 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1949). .
discussed Cited "see" Royster Drive-In Theatres, Inc. v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Milwaukee Towne Corp. v. Loew’s, Inc., 7 Cir., 1951, 190 F.2d 561, 571 , certiorari denied, 1952, 342 U.S. 909 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 ; Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., 7 Cir., 1947, 162 F.2d 520, 524 , certiorari denied 1947, 332 U.S. 817 , 68 S.Ct. 158 , 92 L.Ed. 394 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George B. Rosenfeld and Harriet Rosenfeld v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (2×)
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., Van Zandt v. Commissioner, supra (grantor is also trustee); see also White v. Fitzpatrick, 193 F.2d 398 , 402 n. 2 (2d Cir.1951) ("the factor of independent trusteeship is crucial"), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 928 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1338 (1952); Quinlivan v. Commissioner, supra, 599 F.2d at 273 n. 4 (distinguishing Van Zandt and Perry v. United States, supra, because of the lack of independence of the trustees in those cases).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Delaware Valley Marine Supply Company v. American Tobacco Company
3rd Cir. · 1961 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Brown v. Western Massachusetts Theatres, Inc., 288 F.2d 302, 304-305 (1 Cir., 1961) 23 See Milgram v. Loew's Inc., 192 F.2d 579, 585 (3 Cir. 1951), cert. denied 343 U.S. 929 , 72 S.Ct. 762 , 96 L.Ed. 1339 (1952) 24 66 F.Supp. 323 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1946), modified 334 U.S. 131 , 68 S.Ct. 915 , 92 L.Ed. 1260 (1948), on remand 85 F. Supp. 881 (D.C.S.D.N.Y.1949) 25 The Reynolds' contact with the plaintiff through its local representative, Comey, was not "automatic" in nature.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
White
v.
Fitzpatrick, Collector of Internal Revenue
No. 633.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1952.
343 U.S. 928
John A. Danaher and Muriel S. Paul for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Slack, Lee A. Jackson and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.