Gulf Rsch. & Dev. Co. v. Leahy, 344 U.S. 861 (1952). · Go Syfert
Search
Gulf Rsch. & Dev. Co. v. Leahy, 344 U.S. 861 (1952). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest negative: Tcf Film Corporation v. Gourley (ca3, 1957-01-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Tcf Film Corporation v. Gourley
3rd Cir. · 1957 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Gulf Research & Development Co. v. Leahy, 3 Cir., 1951, 193 F.2d 302 , affirmed by an equally divided court, 344 U.S. 861 , 73 S.Ct. 102 , 97 L.Ed. 668 , and compare La Buy v. Howes Leather Co., 1957, 352 U.S. 249 , 77 S.Ct. 309 , 1 L.Ed.2d 290 6 For illustrations of the useful exercise of this power see In re Stein, D.C.E.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gulf Research & Development Co.
v.
Leahy, U. S. District Judge
No. 24.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 27, 1952.
344 U.S. 861
Leonard S. Lyon argued the cause for petitioners., With him on the brief were Richard E. Lyon and Thomas Cooch., Worth-ington Campbell argued the cause for respondents., With him on the brief were E. Ennalls Berl and Mark N. Dono-hue.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.