green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1908 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1908
1967
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc. v. United States
See Herberger v. Commissioner, 195 F.2d 293 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 820 , 73 S.Ct. 17 , 97 L.Ed. 639 (1952); Bittker, supra note 1, ¶ 105.4.1, at 83 ("the better view today is that cases [like Brookshire ] have continued vitality only in holding that taxpayers required to use inventories can use the cash method for such noninventory items as investment income and *790 interest expense").
cited
Cited "see"
Freiman v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
See Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 194 F.2d 737, 744 (7 Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 820 , 73 S.Ct. 17 , 97 L.Ed. 638 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
P. W. Husserl, Inc. v. Newman
See Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 7 Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 737 , certiorari denied, 344 U.S. 820 , 73 S.Ct. 17 , 97 L.Ed. 638 .
discussed
Cited "see"
D & A Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.
See Kainz v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 7 Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 737 , certiorari denied, 1952, 344 U.S. 820 , 73 S.Ct. 17 , 97 L.Ed. 638 ; Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co., 7 Cir., 1941, 125 F.2d 84 ; Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1950, 9 F.R.D. 677 , affirmed 2 Cir., 204 F.2d 331 , certiorari denied, 1953, 345 U. S. 994 , 73 S.Ct. 1133 , 97 L.Ed. 1401 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Albert L. Trop v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of State of the United States, and United States Department of State
(2×)
See also Revedin v. Acheson, 2 Cir., 194 F.2d 482 , certiorari denied 344 U.S. 820 , 73 S.Ct. 17 , 97 L.Ed. 638 . 3 The important point in both these decisions is, not the especial "objective" facts that the court accepted as the test, but that on both occasions the citizen forfeited her "nationality," not only without supposing that she was doing so, but against her purpose.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
v.
Kainz, doing business as Matt & Neal's Liquors
v.
Kainz, doing business as Matt & Neal's Liquors
No. 90.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1952.
Charles M. Price, Charles B. Mahin and Robert C. Keck for Anheuser-Busch, Inc., and Victor E. La Rue for Home Delivery, Inc. et al., petitioners., Hirsch E. Soble for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.