green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“ne of the purposes for conferring upon the trustee in reorganization broad investigatory powers" is "the exposure of corporate abuses_”
Treatment trajectory · 1953 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1953
1989
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Weissman v. Hassett
ne of the purposes for conferring upon the trustee in reorganization broad investigatory powers" is "the exposure of corporate abuses_
discussed
Cited "see"
Eisenberg v. Feiner (In Re Ahead by a Length, Inc.)
See Austrian v. Williams, 198 F.2d 697 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952); Dabney v. Levy, 191 F.2d 201, 204-05 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 342 U.S. 887 , 72 S.Ct. 177 , 96 L.Ed. 665 (1951); accord Hooper v. Mountain States Securities Corp., 282 F.2d 195, 205-06 (5th Cir.1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 814 , 81 S.Ct. 695 , 5 L.Ed.2d 693 (1961); contra Wells v. Place, 92 F.Supp. 477 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lillian N. Burg v. Max Horn and George Horn, and Darand Realty Corp.
(2×)
Accord, Austrian v. Williams, 103 F.Supp. 64, 76-80 (S.D.N.Y.), rev'd on other grounds, 198 F.2d 697 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952).
cited
Cited "see"
Lowell Wiper Supply Co. v. Helen Shop, Inc.
See Austrian v. Williams, 198 F.2d 697, 700 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 244 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 (1952). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Austrian v. Williams
See Austrian v. Williams, 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 697 , certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Austrian v. Williams
See Austrian v. Williams, 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 697 , certiorari denied 1952, 344 U.S. 909 , 73 S.Ct. 328 , 97 L.Ed. 701 . 3 Following the successful result of the Trustees' action as to them, the seven defendants who are parties to these appeals brought on applications before Judge Weinfeld for allowances of expenses and attorneys' fees in that action.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kross
v.
California
v.
California
No. 407.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 22, 1952.
Irving I. Erdheim for petitioner., Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Frank W. Richards, Assistant Attorney General, and Stanford D. Herlick, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
[*908] Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County. Certiorari denied.