green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City Of Oakland, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F.2d 206 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 794 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 (1953) (related case); see also Alexander v. FERC, 609 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir.1979) (transactions which were metered and billed individually distinguished from others not deemed to be "resales"). 9 Yet FERC contends that the Port Department is most aptly characterized as a landlord that redistributes electricity to a few select tenants--a status it claims is inconsistent with being a reseller.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Oakland v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Accord California Electric Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 199 F.2d 206 (9th Cir.1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 934 , 73 S.Ct. 794 , 97 L.Ed. 1362 (1953) (related case); see also Alexander v. FERC, 609 F.2d 543, 550 (D.C.Cir. 1979) (transactions which were metered and billed individually distinguished from others not deemed to be “resales”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Electric Power Co.
v.
Federal Power Commission
v.
Federal Power Commission
No. 495.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 13, 1953.
Henry W. Coil and Donald J. Carman for petitioner., Solicitor General Cummings filed a memorandum for the United States and the Federal Power Commission, respondents.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.