Johns v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 347 U.S. 964 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Johns v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R., 347 U.S. 964 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Deakyne v. Department of Army (ded, 1982-01-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1954 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1954 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Deakyne v. Department of Army
D. Del. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
It was those' words, in the Court’s opinion, that convinced the courts in the cited cases that the statutes relied on “imported the transfer of the fee simple title.” 39 Del. 596 -98, 5 A.2d at 239 ; accord, Valentine v. Lamont, 25 N.J.Super. 342 , 96 A.2d 417 , aff’d, 13 N.J. 569 , 100 A.2d 668 (1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 966 , 74 S.Ct. 776 , 98 L.Ed. 1108 (1954).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Johns
v.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
No. 625.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1954.
347 U.S. 964
Edward J. Fruchtman and Richard F. Watt for appellant., Edwin H. Burgess and Sydney R. Prince, Jr. for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.; Burke Williamson, Harold C. Heiss and Russell B. Day for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen; and Clifford D. O’Brien and Ruth Weyand for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, appellees.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The judgment of the three-judge court is affirmed.