Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 348 U.S. 888 (1954). · Go Syfert
Search
Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 348 U.S. 888 (1954). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
69 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Walker Manufacturing, Inc. v. Hoffmann, Inc. (iand, 2002-09-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Walker Manufacturing, Inc. v. Hoffmann, Inc.
N.D. Iowa · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied [,] 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers’ Educational and Co-op Union, 247 F.2d 809 (8th Cir.1957); Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir.1957); Drop Dead Co. v. S.C.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Juan Dale Reese, United States of America v. Scott Matthew Dwyer, United States of America v. Daniel Wayne Broussard, United States of America v. Larry Marcel Houston
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Langer, 958 F.2d 522, 524 (2d Cir.1992) ("The Supreme Court has made it perfectly clear that 'once a due process right has been defined and made specific by court decisions, that right is encompassed by Sec. 242.' ") (quoting United States v. Stokes, 506 F.2d 771, 774-75 (5th Cir.1975)). 95 Against this authority, Broussard cites only one case, United States v. Hunter, 214 F.2d 356 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954).
discussed Cited "see" Gene Harris Travel Service, Inc. v. Harris Travel Service, Inc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.) (defendant’s use of words “Minute Made” caused confusion and mistake on part of purchaser as to origin of defendant’s product), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954).
discussed Cited "see" Carlsen v. Morris
D. Utah · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Anderson v. United States, 215 F.2d 84 (6th Cir.1954), cert. denied sub nom., Lewis v. United States, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 698 , rehearing denied, 348 U.S. 922 , 75 S.Ct. 291 , 99 L.Ed. 723 , United States v. Howard, 569 F.2d 1331 (5th Cir.1978), both upholding 18 U.S.C. § 1503 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Herbert A. Howard and Elmer Gary Ritter
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Anderson v. United States, 215 F.2d 84 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954) (upholding section 1503 against challenge for vagueness).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mitchell
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. United States, 215 F.2d 84 (6th Cir.) cert. denied sub nom., Lewis v. United States, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954).
discussed Cited "see" Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (2×)
D. Nev. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers’ Educational and Cooperative Union of America, 247 F.2d 809 (8th Cir. 1957); Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1957); Drop Dead Co. v. S. C.
discussed Cited "see" Franchised Stores of New York, Inc. And Thomas Carvel v. Martin Winter (2×)
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F.2d 792 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954); Iowa Farmers Union v. Farmers’ Educational and Co-operative Union of America, 247 F.2d 809 (8th Cir. 1957); Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1957); Drop Dead Co. v. S. C.
discussed Cited "see" Fancee Free Mfg. Co. v. Fancy Free Fashions, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1957 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pure Foods, Inc., v. Minute Maid Corp., 5 Cir., 214 F.2d 792 , certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 697 ; cf. Yale Electric Corp. v. Robertson, 2 Cir., 1928, 26 F.2d 972, 974 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." T & L Computer Systems, Inc. v. Stanford
N.D. Tex. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
“It is clear that intrastate infringing use is within the provisions of the [Lanham] Act if it has a substantial economic effect upon interstate use by the mark’s owner.” Id. at 488 (quoting Lyon v. Quality Courts United, Inc., 249 F.2d 790 (6th Cir.1957)) (emphasis added); see also Pure Foods v. Minute Maid Corporation, 214 F.2d 792, 795 (5th Cir.) (declaring that a trademark registered under the Lanham Act is protected from infringement which is purely intrastate but which interferes with the free flow of interstate commerce or has a substantial effect on such commerce), cert. denied, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. United States
D.C. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Anderson v. United States, 215 F.2d 84, 89 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954), where the court, confronted by the Pettibone argument, held the defect was one of form only and not reversible error.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John Wayne Baranski
7th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Anderson v. United States, 215 F.2d 84 (6th Cir. 1954), cert, denied, 348 U.S. 888 , 75 S.Ct. 208 , 99 L.Ed. 698 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pure Foods, Inc.
v.
Minute Maid Corp.
No. 392.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 22, 1954.
348 U.S. 888
William C. Martin for petitioner., /. Thomas Gurney for respondent.
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.