green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“when congress has intended that damages in excess of the actual damage sustained by the plaintiff may be recovered in an action created by statute, it has found no difficulty in using language appropriate to that end”
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc.
when congress has intended that damages in excess of the actual damage sustained by the plaintiff may be recovered in an action created by statute, it has found no difficulty in using language appropriate to that end
cited
Cited "see"
Adamson v. Harris
See Collins v. Collins, 175 Pa.Super. 214 , 103 A.2d 494, 497 , cert. denied, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 38 , 99 L.Ed.2d 650 (1954).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. State
See Redding v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 535 , 265 S.W.2d 811 , cert. denied 348 U.S. 838 , 75 S.Ct. 38 , 99 L.Ed. 661 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harbor Carriers of the Port of New York and Its Members v. National Labor Relations Board, Gallagher Bros. Sand & Gravel Corp., Bilkay Holding Corp., Hampton Scows,inc., Neptune Line, Inc., and Rockville Scows, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, National Lablr Relations Board v. Charles J. King and Deck Scow Captains Local 335, United Marine Division, National Maritime Union, Afl-Cio
See Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 210 F.2 852, 857-58 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 38 , 99 L.Ed. 649 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Klissas
The court recognizes that there is substantial authority to the effect that Section 1733 applies to “documents prepared by public officials 6 pursuant to a duty imposed by law — not to documents filed with Government officials and prepared by private parties.” Olender v. United States, 9 Cir. 1954, 210 F.2d 795, 801-802 , 42 A.L.R.2d 736 ; see also United Mine Workers of America v. Patton, 4 Cir. 1954, 211 F.2d 742, 751 , 47 A.L.R.2d 850 , cert. den. 1954, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 38 , 99 L.Ed. 649 ; Matthews v. United States, 5 Cir. 1954, 217 F.2d 409 , 50 A.L.R.2d 1187 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 1545 v. Vincent
However, the policy remains that of Board and one 'Which the Board in its discretion may apply or waive as the facts of a given case may demand in the interest of stability and fairness in collective bargaining agreements.' N.L.R.B. v. Grace Co., 8 Cir., 1950, 184 F.2d 126, 129 ; see also Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. N.L.R.B., Cir., 210 F.2d 852, 857 , certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 824 , 75 S.Ct. 38 , 99 L.Ed. 649 . 5 12 This is sufficient to dispose of appellant's attempt to bring the case within the exception relating to denial of constitutional rights.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Redding
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 140.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1954.
Woodrow Seals for petitioner., John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General of Texas, and Rudy G. Rice, Katherine W. Conti and Horace Wimberly, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.