green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…purpose of the requirements in respect of briefs is to conserve the time and energy of the court and clearly to advise the opposite party of the points he is obliged to meet
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Stuart Hamblen v. County of Los Angeles
(4×)
also: Cited "see"
purpose of the requirements in respect of briefs is to conserve the time and energy of the court and clearly to advise the opposite party of the points he is obliged to meet
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William M. Abroms
(2×)
It “would be patently unfair to the [government] for this court to consider this issue as properly before it.” Cannon v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Union, 657 F.2d 173, 178 (7th Cir.1981); see Thys Co. v. Anglo Cal. Nat’l Bank, 219 F.2d 131 , 133 (9th Cir.) (“The purpose of the requirements in respect of briefs is to conserve the time and energy of the court and clearly to advise the opposite party of the points he is *1251 obliged to meet.”), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 946 , 75 S.Ct. 875 , 99 L.Ed. 1272 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cole v. State
See Johnson v. State, 76 So. 2d 841 (Miss.), cert. denied, 349 U. S. 946 ; Thompson v. State, 68 N. W. 2d 267 (Neb.); Berryman v. State, 283 P. 2d 558 (Okla.); State v. Iverson, 289 P. 2d 603 (Idaho).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chloros v. Carroll
(2×)
See Fitzpatrick v. Snyder, 220 F.2d 522 (1 Cir., 1955), cert. den. 349 U.S. 946 , 75 S.Ct. 875 , 99 L.Ed. 1272 ; Bernstein v. Richards, 125 F.Supp. 720 (D.Mass.1954); Burns v. McCrary, 229 F.2d 286 (2 Cir., 1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jamco, Incorporated, an Oklahoma Corporation, and A. D. Willkinson v. Theodore F. Carlson, and Carlson Manufacturing Co., a Colorado Corporation
(2×)
See Borg-Warner Corporation v. Mall Tool Company, 7 Cir., 220 F.2d 803, 804 , certiorari denied 349 U.S. 946 , 75 S.Ct. 875 , 99 L.Ed. 1272 . 17 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Business Men's Assurance Co.
v.
Driggers
v.
Driggers
No. 739.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1955.
William Lipscomb and George L. Gordon for petitioner.
Cited by 30 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.