Fitzpatrick v. Snyder, 349 U.S. 946 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Fitzpatrick v. Snyder, 349 U.S. 946 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“purpose of the requirements in respect of briefs is to conserve the time and energy of the court and clearly to advise the opposite party of the points he is obliged to meet”
34 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Stuart Hamblen v. County of Los Angeles (ca9, 1986-10-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Stuart Hamblen v. County of Los Angeles (2×) also: Cited "see"
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
purpose of the requirements in respect of briefs is to conserve the time and energy of the court and clearly to advise the opposite party of the points he is obliged to meet
discussed Cited "see" United States v. William M. Abroms
5th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
It “would be patently unfair to the [government] for this court to consider this issue as properly before it.” Cannon v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Union, 657 F.2d 173, 178 (7th Cir.1981); see Thys Co. v. Anglo Cal. Nat’l Bank, 219 F.2d 131 , 133 (9th Cir.) (“The purpose of the requirements in respect of briefs is to conserve the time and energy of the court and clearly to advise the opposite party of the points he is *1251 obliged to meet.”), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 946 , 75 S.Ct. 875 , 99 L.Ed. 1272 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Chloros v. Carroll
D. Mass. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fitzpatrick v. Snyder, 220 F.2d 522 (1 Cir., 1955), cert. den. 349 U.S. 946 , 75 S.Ct. 875 , 99 L.Ed. 1272 ; Bernstein v. Richards, 125 F.Supp. 720 (D.Mass.1954); Burns v. McCrary, 229 F.2d 286 (2 Cir., 1956).
cited Cited "see" Jamco, Incorporated, an Oklahoma Corporation, and A. D. Willkinson v. Theodore F. Carlson, and Carlson Manufacturing Co., a Colorado Corporation
10th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See Borg-Warner Corporation v. Mall Tool Company, 7 Cir., 220 F.2d 803, 804 , certiorari denied 349 U.S. 946 , 75 S.Ct. 875 , 99 L.Ed. 1272 . 17 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fitzpatrick
v.
Snyder, Commander, Boston Naval Shipyard
No. 745.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1955.
349 U.S. 946
Claude L. Dawson for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Paul A. Sweeney for respondents.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.