green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955
1990
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Francina King v. United States
See Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 , 179 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955) ; Richardson v. United States, 150 F.2d 58, 64 (6th Cir. 1945); 6 Wigmore, Evidence § 1808 (3d ed. 1940). .
cited
Cited "see"
Northern California Pharmaceutical Association, a Corporation, and Donald K. Hedgpeth v. United States
See Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theodore Caldes and Wellaine M. Lowery
See, e. g., Callanan v. United States, 223 F.2d 171 (8th Cir., 1955), cert. den. 350 U.S. 862 , 76 S.Ct. 102 , 100 L.Ed. 764 reh. den. 350 U.S. 926 , 76 S.Ct. 210 , 100 L.Ed. 810 (1955); United States v. Sweeney, 262 F.2d 272 (3rd Cir. 1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Musicians Union, Local No. 6 v. Superior Court
In no ease has it been held or intimated that peaceful picketing activities in order to secure employment for union members is a violation of the Hobbs Act. "... [I]t was not the intention of the Congress [in enacting the Hobbs Act] to interfere with the exertion of peaceful economic pressures by a union through the medium of strikes to achieve legitimate labor objectives.” (United States v. Varlack (2d Cir. 1955) 225 2T.2d 665, 669; see also Callanan v. United States (8th Cir. 1955) 223 F.2d 171, 175 , cert. den. 350 U.S. 862 [ 100 L.Ed. 764 , 76 S.Ct. 102 ]; Bianchi v. United States (8th C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United Mine Workers of America
v.
Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.
v.
Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.
No. 227.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 1955.
Crampton Harris and Yelverton Cowherd for petitioners. Grove Stafford for respondent.
Published
Supreme Court of Louisiana. Certiorari granted. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief setting forth the views of the National Labor Relations Board.