Union Trust Co. v. E. Air Lines, Inc., 350 U.S. 907 (1955). · Go Syfert
Union Trust Co. v. E. Air Lines, Inc., 350 U.S. 907 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
155 citation events across 45 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MCorp v. Clarke (txnd, 1991-02-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" MCorp v. Clarke
N.D. Tex. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Union Trust Co. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Roger Aarons and Robert Swann
2d Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Eastern Air Lines v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62, 69 (1955) , rev’d on other grounds, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , order of reversal modified and case remanded, 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 -(1956), ruling on this issue adhered to, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 239 F.2d 25, 28 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 942 , 77 S.Ct. 816 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957); United States v. Reid, 110 F.Supp. 253, 256-257 (D.Md.1955); 1 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 6.10, at 395-396 (1958); 68 Harv.L.Rev. 535, 536 (1955) (commenting on the Hotch decision).
discussed Cited "see" St. Clair v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia v. United States, 113 F.Supp. 80 , D.D.C.1953, modified Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , defendant’s appeal affirmed, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , plaintiffs’ appeal cert. denied, 350 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 799 ; Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , reversed, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , modified and remanded on rehearing, 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , on remand 99 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 239 F.2d 25 …
discussed Cited "see" Josephine A. St. Clair, as of the Estate of Harold W. St. Clair, Deceased v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia v. United States, D.C.D.C.1953, 113 F.Supp. 80 , modified Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S. App.D.C. 189, 221 F.2d 62 , defendant’s appeal affirmed 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , plaintiffs’ appeal certiorari denied 1955, 350 U.S. 911 , 76 S. Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 799 ; Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , reversed 1955, 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , modified and remanded on rehearing 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , on remand 1956, 99 U.S.App.D…
discussed Cited "see" Cook v. United States (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia v. United States, D.C.D.C., 113 F. Supp. 80 , modified in part 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , defendant’s appeal affirmed, 350 U.S. 907 , plaintiffs’ appeal certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 799 ; Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Union Trust Company, 95 U.S. App.D.C. 189, 221 F.2d 62 , reversed 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , remanded 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , affirmed 99 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 239 F.2d 25 , certiorari denied, 353 U.S. 942 , 77 S.Ct. 816 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 . .
discussed Cited "see" Cook v. United States (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
1st Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shortt v. Hudson Supply, etc., Co., 191 Va. 306 , 60 S.E.2d 900 2 See Union Trust Co. of District of Columbia v. United States, D.C.D.C., 113 F.Supp. 80 , modified in part 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , defendant's appeal affirmed, 350 U.S. 907 , plaintiffs' appeal certiorari denied, 350 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 799 ; Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. Union Trust Company, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , reversed 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 , remanded 350 U.S. 962 , 76 S.Ct. 429 , 100 L.Ed. 835 , affirmed 99 U.S.App.D.C. 205 , 239 F.2d 25 , certiorari denied, 353…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company (2×)
1st Cir. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
See Eastern Air Lines v. Union Trust Co. (United States v. Union Trust Co.) 1955, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62, 80 , affirmed on other grounds 76 S.Ct. 192 . 36 It taxes our credulity to suppose that Congress, in enacting the 1947 amendment to permit recovery in Massachusetts and Alabama while assuring that damages against the United States under their acts should not be assessed on a punitive basis, intended thereby to compel the result that, in Massachusetts alone of all the states whose respective Death Acts contain a maximum limit of recovery, the United States might be held liable in…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." M.R. (Vega Alta), Inc. v. Caribe General Electric Products, Inc.
D.P.R. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
Nevertheless, since the key is justified, reasonable, detrimental reliance, “[w]e doubt that the Supreme Court in Indian Towing would have found liability if the government’s negligence simply amounted to failing to construct a lighthouse as ordered by a Coast Guard official when the seafaring public was unaware that such an order had been given, and the lighthouse was never operational.” Zabala Clemente v. United States, 567 F.2d 1140, 1148 (1st Cir.1977); see also United States v. Union Trust Co., 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 (1955) (government liable for negligence of a…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Seal v. Miller
Miss. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Comment, Miss.R.Evid. 614; see also Jones v. State, 223 Miss. 812 , 79 So.2d 273 (1955), appeal dismissed, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 869 [ 76 S.Ct 116 , 100 L.Ed. 770 ] (1955), rehearing denied, 350 U.S. 919 [ 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed 805] (1955); Rule 5.08 Uniform Criminal Rules of Circuit Court Practice.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kolitch v. Lindedahl (2×)
N.J. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Thus, decisions made by government-employed experts may be reviewed if they do not involve considerations of public policy because "[t]he presence of a pre-existing safety standard, or other appropriate standards governing the activity in question, * * * tend[s] to displace the room that otherwise exists for governmental discretion and immunity." Prosser & Keeton, supra, at 1041-42; see, e.g., United States v. Union Trust Co., 350 U.S. 907 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 796 (1955) (air traffic controllers could be held liable for negligent performance of their duty as experts in guiding airplanes …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McCullough v. United States
E.D.N.Y · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
Terminal Air Traffic Control Manual, 7110.-8D; Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., 373 F.2d 227 (2d Cir. 1967); See also Eastern Air Lines v. Union Trust Company, 221 F.2d 62 (D.C.Cir.1965), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 799 (1957); Stork v. United States, 430 F.2d 1104 (9th Cir. 1970); Hartz v. United States, 387 F.2d 870 (5th Cir. 1968).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marian E. Bartch v. United States
10th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cook v. United States, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 689 , and United States v. Union Trust Co., 95 U.S.App.D.C. 189 , 221 F.2d 62 , cert. denied, 350 U.S. 911 , 76 S.Ct. 192 , 100 L.Ed. 799 , wherein the Virginia maximum recovery provision was given similar application. 2 . 28 U.S.C.A. § 2074 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Trust Co.
v.
Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
No. 298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1955.
350 U.S. 907
David G. Bress, Sheldon E. Bernstein, Alvin L. Newmyer and Jo V. Morgan, Jr. for petitioners. Joseph W. Henderson, Richard W. Galiher and John M. Aherne for respondent.
Certiorari, Frankfurter, Would.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed.*

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Harlan would not grant certiorari.

Modified, post, p. 962.