Daniels v. Thomas, 350 U.S. 932 (1956). · Go Syfert
Search
Daniels v. Thomas, 350 U.S. 932 (1956). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1976 · …the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration. ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
29 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Lamb Communications, Inc., Liberty Communications, Inc. And Summit Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America (cadc, 1976-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1957 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1957 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Lamb Communications, Inc., Liberty Communications, Inc. And Summit Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) National Cable Television Ass'n v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Electronic Industries Association, Consumer Electronics Group v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the test of a reasonable fee is that it shall be no greater than is sufficient to cover the expenses of administration.
cited Cited "see" Howard v. First National Bank of Denver, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Daniels v. Thomas, 10 Cir., 225 F.2d 795, 798 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 932 , 76 S.Ct. 303 , 100 L.Ed.2d 815 .
discussed Cited "see" John H. Gately v. Leonard v. B. Sutton, Otto Moore, Edward C. Day, William E. Doyle, Frank H. Hall, and Francis J. Knauss
10th Cir. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Daniels v. Thomas, 10 Cir., 225 F.2d 795 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 932 , 76 S.Ct. 303 , 100 L.Ed. 815 ; Jones v. Medlock, 10 Cir., 180 F.2d 658 , cert. denied 340 U.S. 819 , 71 S.Ct. 50 , 95 L.Ed. 602 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniels
v.
Thomas
No. 502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1956.
350 U.S. 932
Bentley M. McMullin for petitioners. William V. Hodges for respondent.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 88%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (3)

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.