3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 100 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Stallworth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Stallworth Anchor | green | “a reviewing court 'may not substitute its own judgment for the agency's, even though the court might have reached a different result.” | 55 |
| 2 | Russo v. NJ Dept. of Corrections | green | “prisons are dangerous places, and the courts must afford appropriate deference and flexibility to administrators trying to manage this volatile environment.” | 31 |
| 3 | Figueroa v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS | green | “our function . . . merely to rubberstamp an agency's decision.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.