green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad
In a memorandum opinion, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of this Court of Appeals, saying that it was “of the opinion that the District Court correctly found there was proper service upon the defendant * * 350 U.S. at 1003, 76 S.Ct. at 648.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
J. W. Edwards v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company
The complaint also alleged, of course, that the matter in controversy exceeded the requisite jurisdictional amount 25 In a memorandum opinion, the Supreme Court reversed the decision of this Court of Appeals, saying that it was "of the opinion that the District Court correctly found there was proper service upon the defendant * * *." 350 U.S. at 1003, 76 S.Ct. at 648.
discussed
Cited "see"
Palm Beach Isles Associates v. United States
See Palm Beach Isles Assocs. v. United States, 208 F.3d at 1385 (“If the interests of navigation are served, it is constitutionally irrelevant that other purposes may also be advanced.”) (quoting United States v. Twin City Power Co., 350 U.S. 222, 224 , 76 S.Ct. 259 , 100 L.Ed. 240 , reh’g denied, 350 U.S. 1009 , 76 S.Ct. 648 , 100 L.Ed. 871 (1956)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mutual International Export Co. v. Napco Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Riverbank Laboratories v. Hardwood Products Corp., 7 Cir., 220 F.2d 465 (1955), reversed per curiam, 350 U.S. 1003 , 76 S. Ct. 648 , 100 L.Ed. 866 (1956); Mississippi Wood Preserving Co. v. Rothschild, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 233 (1953); Partin v. Michaels Art Bronze Co., 3 Cir., 202 F.2d 541 (1953); Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co., 1 Cir., 170 F.2d 193 (1948) On the other hand, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has assumed that Rule 4(d) (3) should be coupled with a uniform federal standard of amenability in diversity cases and looks generally to federal precedents to determine whet…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raymond Bag Co.
v.
Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio
v.
Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio
No. 316.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 2, 1956.
Wellmore B. Turner and Guy H. Wells for appellant. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, and Jack H. Bertsch and Larry H. Snyder, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Jurisdiction, Would.
Published
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.
Per Curiam:The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas would note probable jurisdiction.