green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McLennan v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
McLennan v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southland Royalty Co. v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allstate Insurance v. United States
See Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. United States, 133 Ct.Cl. 376 , 135 F.Supp. 881 (1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 909 , 76 S.Ct. 694 , 100 L.Ed. 1444 (1956), reh’g denied, 352 U.S. 1019 , 77 S.Ct. 552 , 1 L.Ed.2d 562 (1957), reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 898 , 81 S.Ct. 218 , 5 L.Ed.2d 192 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shotwell Manufacturing Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 10.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1957.
Harold A. Smith and Howard Ellis for the Shotwell Manufacturing Co. et ah, petitioners. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney General Rice for the United States.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
On cross-petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The motion of Frank J. -Huebner to withdraw from the conditional cross-petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The motion of Harold A. Smith et al. for leave to withdraw as counsel for Frank J. Huebner is granted. The motion to treat the conditional cross-petition for writ of certiorari as an unconditional cross-petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The cross-petition for writ of certiorari in this case is denied.