green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Petroleum & Supply Co. v. Girard Bank
See Elliott & Sons, Inc. v. Nuodex Products Co., 243 F.2d 116, 119 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); cf. Leroy v. Great Western United Corp., 443 U.S. 173, 180 , 99 S.Ct. 2710, 2714 , 61 L.Ed.2d 464 (1979) (“when there is a sound prudential justification for doing so, ... a court may reverse the normal order of considering personal jurisdiction and venue.”) Therefore, we will proceed to a discussion of that issue.
discussed
Cited "see"
Peerless Dental Supply Co. v. Weber Dental Manufacturing Co.
Reversing a $190,-000 jury verdict for plaintiff, the Dis *290 trict of Columbia Circuit noted that the facts that other dealers in the same product were eliminated and that one of the competing dealers had requested the arrangement did not make it illegal; for these were the natural characteristics of the birth of an exclusive dealership, itself not illegal under the Sherman Act, id. at 421; accord, Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Co., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy for John Milton Addison, Bankrupt
See Akers v. Scofield, 5 Cir. 1948, 167 F.2d 718 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 69 S.Ct. 47 , 93 L.Ed. 378 , 54 Tex.Jur.2d, Swindling and Cheating, §§ 2, 14. 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terry's Floor Fashions, Inc. v. Burlington Industries, Inc. Lees Carpets, a Division of Burlington Industries, Inc. And Eatman's Carpets, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Schwing, Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corporation, 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff'd, 239 F.2d 176 (4 Cir.1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957); Packard Motor Car Co. v. Webster Motor Car Co., 243 F.2d 418 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) (rule of reason applied where car manufacturer terminated plaintiff dealer to make another dealer its sole outlet in Baltimore area).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cernuto, Incorporated v. United Cabinet Corporation
See also Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), Aff'd, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), Cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957) 23 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (En banc ), Cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) 24 Id. 130 25 On the other hand, if United acted in pursuit of its own policy, but that policy was itself a form of resale price maintenance, involving other parties in its enforcement, it might constitute a Per se violation of the Act under United States v. Parke, Davis & Co., 362 U.S. 29 , 80 S.Ct. 503 , 4 L.Ed.2d 505…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cernuto, Inc. v. United Cabinet Corp.
See also Schwing Motor Co. v. Hudson Sales Corp., 138 F.Supp. 899 (D.Md.), aff’d, 239 F.2d 176 (4th Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 823 , 78 S.Ct. 30 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 (1957). . 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978). .
Reed
v.
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 210.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
David A. Canel for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.