green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
BURGGRAF SERVICES, INC. v. H2O SOLUTIONS
Conoco , ¶19, citing World-Wide Volkswagen Corporation v. Woodson , 444 U.S. 286, 297, 78 S.Ct. 559, 567, 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980). ¶7 All elements of an enforceable contract occurred in Texas.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State Ex Rel. General Motors Corp. v. City of Oak Creek
Sec. 70.18, Stats., entitled “Personal property, to whom assessed,” reads in part: “(1) Personal property shall be assessed to the owner thereof, except that when it is in the charge or possession of some person other than the owner it may be assessed to the person so in charge or possession of the same. ...” *307 This statute was discussed and applied in American Motors Corp. v. Kenosha (1957), 274 Wis. 315 , 80 N. W. 2d 363 , affirmed per curiam (1958), 356 U. S. 21 , 78 Sup. Ct. 559, 2 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mitchell Aero, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
(2×)
American Motors Corp. v. Kenosha (1957), 274 Wis. 315 , 80 N. W. 2d 363 , affirmed 356 U. S. 21 , 78 Sup. Ct. 559, 2 L.
examined
Cited "see"
Verco Industries v. United States (In Re Verco Industries)
(3×)
See American Motors Corp. v. Kenosha, 274 Wis. 315 , 80 N.W.2d 363 (1957), aff’d per curiam, 356 U.S. 21 , 78 S.Ct. 559 , 2 L.Ed.2d 578 (1958).
examined
Cited "see"
Lockheed Aircraft Corporation v. The United States
(3×)
See American Motors Corp. v. City of Kenosha, 356 U.S. 21 , 78 S.Ct. 559 , 2 L.Ed.2d 578 (1958); City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U.S. 489 , 78 S.Ct. 458 , 2 L.Ed.2d 441 (1958); United States v. City of Detroit, 355 U.S. 466 , 78 S.Ct. 474 , 2 L.Ed.2d 424 (1958); United States v. Township of Muskegon, 355 U.S. 484 , 78 S.Ct. 483 , 2 L.Ed.2d 436 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Israel-British Bank (London) Limited
See, e. g., Stephen v. Zivnostenka Banks, 31 Misc.2d 10 , 155 N.Y.S.2d 340 (1956), aff'd 2 A.D.2d 958 , 157 N.Y.S.2d 903 , aff'd, 2 A.D.2d 958 , 157 N.Y.S.2d 904 , aff'd, 3 N.Y.2d 862 , 166 N.Y.S.2d 309 , 145 N.E.2d 24 (1957), appeal dismissed, 356 U.S. 22 , 78 S.Ct. 560 , 2 L.Ed.2d 578 (foreign bank had been nationalized); Augstein v. Banska A. Hutui Akciova Spolecnost, 124 N.Y.S.2d 446 , modified on other grounds, 282 App.Div. 929 , 125 N.Y.S.2d 647 (1953); (foreign bank had been nationalized). 12 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AMERICAN MOTORS CORP. Et Al.
v.
CITY OF KENOSHA
v.
CITY OF KENOSHA
343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1958.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, John N. Stull, A. F. Prescott and H. Eugene Heine, Jr. for the United States, and Alfred E. LaFrance for the American Motors Corporation, appellants., Wm. J. P. Abert and Robert V. Baker for appellee.
Frankfurter, Burton, Harlan, Corp.
Cited by 18 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter, Mr. Justice Burton, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons set forth in their dissenting opinions in City of Detroit v. Murray Corp., 355 U. S. 489, 495, 505, 511, decided March 3, 1958.