green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Company, Inc.
See Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Federal Power Commission, supra.” ( 255 F.2d 865 .) (Emphasis supplied.) Support for the proposition that the Natural Gas Act is not inconsistent with agreements between the parties for repayments in the event certain increases in rates are held void is found in Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Harrington, 5 Cir., 1957, 246 F.2d 915 , certiorari denied 356 U.S. 957 , 78 S.Ct. 992 , 995, 2 L.Ed.2d 1065 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alf M. Landon v. Northern Natural Gas Company
See also Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Harrington, 246 F.2d 915 (5th Cir.) cert. den., 356 U.S. 957 , 78 S. Ct. 992 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1065 , and United Gas *21 Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Div., 358 U.S. 103 , 79 S.Ct. 194 , 3 L.Ed.2d 153 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BABCOCK
v.
CALIFORNIA
v.
CALIFORNIA
No. 853.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1958.
Austin Clapp for appellant., Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.
Published
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.