Finsky v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 356 U.S. 957 (1958). · Go Syfert
Finsky v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., 356 U.S. 957 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“this court, of course, generally refuses to entertain arguments raised for the first time in an appellant's reply brief.”
14 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (ca9, 2001-12-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
9th Cir. · 2001 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
this court, of course, generally refuses to entertain arguments raised for the first time in an appellant's reply brief.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Willie Clyde Harris
7th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Finsky v. Union Carbide and Carbon Corp., 249 F.2d 449, 459 (7th Cir. 1957), cert. denied 356 U.S. 957 , 78 S.Ct. 993 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1065 (1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Finsky, doing business as Surplex Sales
v.
Union Carbide & Carbon Corp., owners and operators of Division known as Haynes Stellite Co.
No. 871.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1958.
356 U.S. 957
Avrum N. Andalman and Harry C. Fins for petitioners., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.