green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Colo. Dept. of Soc. Serv. v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS
See State Wholesale Grocers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 154 F.Supp. 471 (D.Ill. 1957), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 258 F.2d 831 (7th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 947 , 79 S.Ct. 353 , 3 L.Ed.2d 352 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County Commissioners
See State Wholesale Grocers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 154 F.Supp. 471 (D.Ill.1957), aff 'd in part, rev’d in part, 258 F.2d 831 (7th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 947 , 79 S.Ct. 353 , 3 L.Ed.2d 352 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alterman Foods, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Macy & Co. v. FTC, 326 F.2d 445, 450 (2d Cir. 1964); see State Wholesale Grocers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 258 F.2d 831, 838 (7th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 947 , 79 S.Ct. 353 , 3 L.Ed.2d 352 (1959).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Westerngeco L.L.C. v. Ion Geophysical Corp.
(4×)
See, e.g., Herrmann v. Rogers, 358 U.S. 332, 332 (1959) (limiting the appellate court’s review on remand to a finite issue of Idaho property law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown
Compare Brown v. Memorial Nat’l Home Foundation, 162 Cal.App.2d 513 , 329 P.2d 118, 131 , 75 A. L.R.2d 427, cert. denied, 358 U.S. 943 , 79 S.Ct. 353 , 3 L.Ed.2d 352 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leedom v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108
See, e. g., State Wholesale Grocers v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 7 Cir., 258 F.2d 831, 839 , certiorari denied, 1958, 358 U.S. 947 , 79 S.Ct. 353 , 3 L.Ed.2d 352 . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Herrmann, Trustee,
v.
Rogers, Attorney General
v.
Rogers, Attorney General
572.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 26, 1959.
Burton K. Wheeler and Robert G. Seaks for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to it, to consider whether, under the law of property of Idaho, it was possible, after the time of the making of the conveyance, for any person other than the named beneficiaries of the trust to acquire a property interest in it (other than through a named beneficiary), and, in the light of its determination as to this, to reconsider its holding that respondent was entitled to all the trust funds remaining in the hands of the trustee.