Oliphant v. Bhd. of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 359 U.S. 935 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Oliphant v. Bhd. of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, 359 U.S. 935 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: National Labor Relations Board v. Mansion House Center Management Corporation, Painters Local 115, Intervenor (ca8, 1973-02-12) · Strongest negative: Hurwitz v. Directors Guild Of America, Inc. (ca2, 1966-07-14)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Hurwitz v. Directors Guild Of America, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see"
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Oliphant v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 262 F.2d 359 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 935 , 79 S.Ct. 648 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959).
discussed Cited "but see" Hurwitz v. Directors Guild of America, Inc. (2×) also: Cited "see"
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Oliphant v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 262 F.2d 359 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 935 , 79 S.Ct. 648 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959).
cited Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Mansion House Center Management Corporation, Painters Local 115, Intervenor
8th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Oliphant v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 262 F.2d 359 (6 Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 935 , 79 S.Ct. 648 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 (1959).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Al Marshall v. Central of Georgia Railway Company
5th Cir. · 1959 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Oliphant v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 6 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 359 , certiorari denied, 1959, 359 U.S. 935 , 79 S.Ct. 648 , 3 L.Ed.2d 636 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oliphant
v.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen
No. 560.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 9, 1959.
359 U.S. 935
Joseph L. Rauh, Jr. and John Silard for petitioners., Harold C. Heiss, Russell B. Day and Milton-Kramer for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

.In view of the abstract context in which the questions sought to be raised are presented by this record; the petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is denied.