green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Johns Hopkins University v. CellPro
Cooper Distributing Co. v. Amana Refrigeration, 63 F.3d 262 (3d Cir.1995); see general *313 ly Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 86-87 (3d Cir.), certif. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Jane Klein and Douglas Klein, Her Husband v. John S. Hollings Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. Tennessee Kartage, Inc. Ryder Temperature Control Carrier, Inc. John S. Hollings Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. And Tennessee Kartage, Inc. A/K/A Ryder Temperature Control Carriage, Jane Klein and Douglas Klein, Her Husband v. John S. Hollings Ryder Temperature Control Carrier, Inc. John S. Hollings Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. And Tennessee Kartage, Inc. A/K/A Ryder Temperature Control Carriage
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Klein v. Hollings
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Maylie v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Finkelstein v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Rich v. District of Columbia, 410 A.2d 528, 535-36 (D.C. 1979) (citing Taylor v. Washington Terminal Co., 133 U.S.App.D.C. 110 , 113, 409 F.2d 145, 148 , cert. denied, 396 U.S. 835 , 90 S.Ct. 93 , 24 L.Ed.2d 85 (1969), and Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960)); see also Brun-Jacobo v. Pan Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Grenz v. Kelsch
See 5A Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 49.03[4] (1987). [2] Kelsch urges this court to adopt a standard of review requiring "close scrutiny" for orders granting a new trial on the grounds the verdict is contrary to the weight of evidence than for orders granting a new trial on other grounds, as set forth in Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3 Cir.1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Roebuck, Dr. James R. v. Drexel University
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). 36 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Marion v. Coffran v. Hitchcock Clinic, Inc.
See Borras, 586 F.2d at 887 , quoting Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). 1 Applying these stan *7 dards after a careful review of the record, we are constrained to conclude that the district court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial, and that the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendant Clinic must be reinstated.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jolane Russell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723 (D.C.Cir.1978) and the cases cited therein, particularly Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Schreffler v. Board of Education of Delmar School District
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (C.A.3) (en banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Kerry Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79 (3rd Cir.), cert, denied 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-Appellee
(2×)
Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp., 407 F.2d 443, 446 (3d Cir. 1968); see Lind v. Schenely Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corporation
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Denneny v. Siegel et al., 407 F. 2d 433 , (3rd Cir. 1969), and cases there cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp.
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Denneny v. Siegel et al., 407 F.2d 433 , (3rd Cir. 1969), and cases there cited.
cited
Cited "see"
American Independent Oil Co. v. M. S. Alkaid
See General Foods Corp. v. The Mormacsurf, 276 F.2d 722 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 52 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.
See Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79 (C.A.3d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 ; Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co., 249 F.2d 246 (C.A.9th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 968 , 78 S.Ct. 1008 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1074 ; Bailey v. Slentz, 189 F.2d 406 (C.A.10th Cir. 1951).
cited
Cited "see"
Livergood v. S. J. Groves & Sons Co.
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88 (C.A.3, 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Alverta Livergood and Omer Livergood, Her Husband, in Their Own Right, and on Behalf of Roy Livergood v. S. J. Groves & Sons Company, a Minnesota Corporation v. Charles Livergood, Third-Party
See Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88 (C.A.3, 1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 . 72 If defendant's contention is to have any validity here, then any jury verdict in a serious bodily injury case where the testimony is conflicting would be violable.
cited
Cited "see"
Firestone Synthetic Fibers Company-- Division of the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, Libelant-Appellant v. M/s Black Heron, Her Engines, Etc. And Black Diamond Steamship Corp. v. Sverre Holmen, Chief Officer, and Arne Johansen, Carpenter, of the M/s Black Heron
See General Foods Corp. v. The Mormacsurf, 276 F.2d 722 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed. 52 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Firestone Synthetic Fibers Co.—Division of Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. M/S Black Heron
See General Foods Corp. v. The Mormacsurf, 276 F.2d 722 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 822 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed. 52 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Menard, Inc. v. Dage-MTI, Inc.
(2×)
See also Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 85 (3d Cir.) ("In many cases the same facts will support a finding of `apparent' or `inherent agency.'"), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960). [2] There are at least two relevant sections of the Restatement (Second) of Agency, which define the scope and extent of inherent authority as it relates to the facts of this case: § 8A (entitled, "Inherent Agency Power"), and § 161 (entitled, "Unauthorized Acts of General Agent"). [3] The Restatement explains, The rule in this Section ... [is an] important illustration[ ]…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Insurance
Co., 802 F.2d 667, 671 (3d Cir.1986); see also Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 84 (3d Cir.1960) (in a diversity case the division of functions between the court and the jury is controlled by federal law), cert. denied, Schenley Indus., Inc. v. Lind, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Warner v. Lawrence
See, e.g., Lind v. Schenley Indus., Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88-90 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craft v. Metromedia, Inc.
See also Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Aalco Wrecking Co., 466 F.2d 179, 187 (8th Cir.1972) (court may order new trial if first trial resulted in a miscarriage of justice), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 930 , 93 S.Ct. 1371 , 35 L.Ed.2d 592 (1973). “[W]here the trial court finds the verdict contrary to the weight of the evidence and grants a new trial ... the appellate court should ‘exercise a closer degree of scrutiny and supervision ... in order to protect the litigants’ right to jury trial.’ ” Id., 466 F.2d at 187 (quoting Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90 (3rd Cir.),…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Duane Keeler v. David Hewitt
Compare Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 90-91 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A. A. Spurlin, Surviving Parent of Douglas J. Spurlin, a Minor, Deceased v. General Motors Corporation
See, e. g, Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960); Cities Service Oil Co. v. Launey, 403 F.2d 537 (5th Cir. 1968); Duncan v. Duncan, 377 F.2d 49, 52-55 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 913 , 88 S.Ct. 239 , 19 L.Ed.2d 260 (1967); Fireman’s Fund Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Dawson
Compare Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 278 F.2d 79, 88 (3 Cir. in banc), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 835 , 81 S.Ct. 58 , 5 L.Ed.2d 60 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schenley Industries, Inc.
v.
Lind
v.
Lind
No. 205.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1960.
John Milton, Jr. for petitioner. Irving J. Soloway for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The motion of the respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.