green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanco v. Banco Industrial De Venezuela
See Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696 , 698 & n. 5 (2d Cir.) (stockholders not entitled to bring derivative action under law of Venezuela), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blanco v. Banco Industrial de Venezuela, S.A.
See Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696 , 698 & n. 5 (2d Cir.) (stockholders not entitled to bring derivative action under law of Venezuela), ce rt. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kreindler v. Marx
See Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962); Lowell Wiper Supply Co. v. Helen Shop Inc., 235 F.Supp. 640 (S.D.N.Y.1964); and Gallup v. Caldwell, 120 F.2d 90 (3d Cir. 1941).
cited
Cited "see"
Goldberg v. Meridor
See Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Goldberg v. Meridor
See Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.
(2×)
See Locklin v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., 299 F.2d 160, 166 (9 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 861 , 82 S.Ct. 950 , 8 L.Ed.2d 18 , rehearing denied, 369 U.S. 891 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 291 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Levine v. Milton
See Hausman v. Buckley, 2 Cir., 299 F.2d 696 , 93 A.L.R.2d 1340 , cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 .
cited
Cited "see"
Levine v. Milton
See Hausman v. Buckley, 2 Cir., 299 F.2d 696 , 93 A.L.R.2d 1340 , cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lowell Wiper Supply Co. v. Helen Shop, Inc.
See Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696, 703 , 93 A.L.R. 2d 1340 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962). 4 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pisacane v. Italia Societa Per Azioni Di Navigazione
See also, generally, Hausman v. Buckley, 299 F.2d 696, 701 (2 Cir. 1962) cert. den. 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 (1962) and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phelps v. Bookwalter
See also Hausman v. Buckley (2nd Cir., 1962) 299 F.2d 696 , 704, cert. den. 369 U.S. 885 , 82 S.Ct. 1157 , 8 L.Ed.2d 286 , in which it was held that the only proper function of the federal court “is to ascertain what the [state] law is, and not to speculate about what it will be”.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hausman
v.
Buckley
v.
Buckley
No. 805.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1962.
Frederick H. Block and Irving Sonnenschein for petitioners., Alexis C. Coudert for Pantepec Oil Co., C. A., and Thomas W. Hill, Jr. for Buckley et al., respondents.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.