Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. v. City of Mesa, 372 U.S. 704 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. v. City of Mesa, 372 U.S. 704 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Community Builders, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal Corporation, and the City of Scottsdale, a Municipal Corporation (ca9, 1981-08-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Community Builders, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal Corporation, and the City of Scottsdale, a Municipal Corporation (2×)
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural and Power District, 92 Ariz. 91 , 373 P.2d 722 (1962), appeal dismissed, 372 U.S. 704 , 83 S.Ct. 1018 , 10 L.Ed.2d 124 (1963). § 9-516(B) assures a municipality the right to acquire the facilities of any public service corporation by eminent domain.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joseph S. George, Jr. And Ricky D. Jackson v. Robert Parratt, Warden, Nebraska Penal Complex
8th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Meyerkooth v. State, 173 Neb. 889, 115 N.W.2d 585, 588 (1962), appeal dismissed, 372 U.S. 705, 83 S.Ct. 1018 , 10 L.Ed.2d 125 (1963); Thorin v. Burke, 146 Neb. 94 , 18 N.W.2d 664, 665 (1945).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ledford
N.C. Ct. App. · 1975 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Johnson v. State, 246 Miss. 182 , 145 So. 2d 156 , appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 372 U.S. 702 , 83 S.Ct. 1018 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 125 with Sullivan v. State, 254 So. 2d 762 (Miss. 1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT & POWER DIST.
v.
CITY OF MESA.
803.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1963.
372 U.S. 704
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.

William R. Meagher for appellant.

J. La Mar Shelley, Charles S. Rhyne, Brice W. Rhyne and Alfred J. Tighe, Jr. for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.