Morris Plan Co. v. Comm'r, 371 U.S. 925 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Morris Plan Co. v. Comm'r, 371 U.S. 925 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leroy Haith v. United States (ca3, 1964-04-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Leroy Haith v. United States
3rd Cir. · 1964 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. Townsend v. Sain, supra [372 U.S.] at 312, 318 [83 S.Ct., at 293, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 ].
discussed Cited "see" State v. Brooks (2×)
N.M. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Peke, 70 N.M. 108, 115 , 371 P.2d 226, 230 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 924 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 232 (1962); State v. Bryant, 99 N.M. 149, 150 , 655 P.2d 161, 162 (Ct.App.1982).
discussed Cited "see" In Re William Wallace, Debtor. Mark Klemens v. William Wallace
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Peke, 70 N.M. 108, 115 , 371 P.2d 226, 231 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 924 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 232 (1962); State v. Seefeldt, 54 N.M. 24, 26 , 212 P.2d 1053, 1054 (1949); see also Rainbo Baking Co. v. Apodaca, 88 N.M. 501 , 542 P.2d 1191 (Ct.App.) (tort action for embezzlement), cert. denied, 89 N.M. 6 , 546 P.2d 71 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." George W. Bell, Jr., James E. Brewton, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Aerodex, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
5th Cir. · 1973 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Blair, supra (back wages), Hire, supra (severance pay), and Alvado v. General Motors Corp., S.D.N.Y.1961, 194 F.Supp. 314 , aff’d, 2 Cir. 1962, 303 F.2d 718 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (vacation allowance pay), with Witty v. Louisville & N.R.R., 7 Cir. 1965, 342 F.2d 614 (seniority), Leonick v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 2 Cir. 1958, 258 F.2d 48 (reinstatement plus damages), and Conseglio v. Pennsylvania R.R., S.D.N.Y. 1962, 211 F.Supp. 567 (seniority).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Moss
N.M. Ct. App. · 1971 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare State v. Peke, 70 N.M. 108 , 371 P.2d 226 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 924 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 232 (1962).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Reynolds
D.D.C. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Campisi, 306 F.2d 308, 312 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962) ; 1 C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Miranda Fuel Co.
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Alvado v. General Motors Corp., 303 F.2d 718 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962). ****** “These authorities establish the principle that a union does not violate Section 8(b) (2) unless the discrimination which the union seeks would constitute a violation of Section 8(a) (3) if the employer acted without union suggestion or compulsion.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc., National Labor Relations Board v. Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Alvado v. General Motors Corp., 303 F.2d 718 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962). 36 'These authorities establish the principle that a union does not violate Section 8(b)(2) unless the discrimination which the union seeks would constitute a violation of Section 8(a)(3) if the employer acted without union suggestion or compulsion.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Independent (2×)
2d Cir. · 1963 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Alvado v. General Motors Corp., 303 F.2d 718 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morris Plan Co. of California
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 534.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1962.
371 U.S. 925
Julian 0. Von Kalinowski for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer and Joseph Kovner for respondent.
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.