Stand. Cigar Co. v. Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S. A., 376 U.S. 780 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Stand. Cigar Co. v. Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S. A., 376 U.S. 780 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Inc. (hid, 1989-01-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Inc.
D. Haw. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225, 231 , 84 S.Ct. 784, 789 , 11 L.Ed.2d 661 reh. denied, 376 U.S. 973 , 84 S.Ct. 1131 , 12 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth ex rel. Zimmerman v. Nickel
pactcomplmercer · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Company, 376 U.S. 225 , 84 S.Ct. 784 (1964), rehearing den., 376 U.S. 973 , 84 S.Ct. 1131 ; Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 (1943); and White Motor Company v. Mallone, 545 F. 2d 599 (8th Cir. 1976), aff'd 100 S.Ct. 233 .
cited Cited "see" McClary v. Wagoner
Mich. Ct. App. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Merz (1964), 376 US 192 ( 84 S Ct 639 , 11 L Ed 2d 629 ), rehearing denied 376 US 973 ( 84 S Ct 1131 , 12 L Ed 2d 87 ). 2 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, §§ 16.05, 16.06.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Simon v. Birraporetti's Restaurants, Inc.
S.D. Tex. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co., 376 U.S. 225, 233 , 84 S.Ct. 784, 789 , 11 L.Ed.2d 661 (1964), reh’g denied, 376 U.S. 973 , 84 S.Ct. 1131 , 12 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234, 237 , 84 S.Ct. 779, 781 , 11 L.Ed.2d 669 (1964), reh’g denied, 377 U.S. 913 , 84 S.Ct. 1162 , 12 L.Ed.2d 183 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Standard Cigar Co.
v.
Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S. A.
78.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1964.
376 U.S. 780
William, A. Gillen for petitioner., Thomas H. Anderson and Herbert L. Nadeau for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, ante, p. 398.