discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gurton v. Manuti See, e. g., Harvey v. Calhoon, 324 F.2d 486 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. granted 375 U.S. 991 , 84 S.Ct. 633 , 11 L.Ed.2d 478 (1964), where the Constitution and By-Laws, although complied with, were held to violate Section 101 (a) (1), 29 U.S.C. § 411 (a) (1) and Section 101(b), 29 U.S.C. § 411 (b), which provides : “Any provision of the constitution and bylaws of any labor organization which is inconsistent with the provisions of this section shall be of no force or effect.” Compare Rothstein v. Manuti, supra,, where, although the By-Laws were alleged to have been violated, the conduct, did no…