Galamison v. New York, 380 U.S. 977 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Galamison v. New York, 380 U.S. 977 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
80 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Young v. Harder (ksd, 1973-06-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Young v. Harder
D. Kan. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
Note, Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.: Jurisdictional Ramifications, supra, at 1142; see New York v. Galamison, 342 F.2d 255, 266-268 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. den., 380 U.S. 977 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965); cf. Rosado v. Wyman, 414 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1969), rev’d on other grounds, 397 U.S. 397 , 90 S.Ct. 1207 , 25 L.Ed.2d 442 (1970).
discussed Cited "see" Rosado v. Wyman
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See People of State of New York v. Galamison, 342 F.2d 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 977 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965); Bradford Audio Corp. v. Pious, 392 F.2d 67 (2d Cir. 1968). 37 Moreover, it is clear that the defendant Department of Social Services for the State of New York is not a "person" within the meaning of Section 1983.
cited Cited "see" Rosado v. Wyman
2d Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See People of State of New York v. Galamison, 342 F.2d 255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 977 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965); Bradford Audio Corp. v. Pious, 392 F.2d 67 (2d Cir. 1968).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ronald Carabbia
6th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lewis, 338 F.2d 137 , cert. den. 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 .
cited Cited "see" People of the State of New York v. Milton A. Galamison
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See 85 S.Ct. 1342 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Garland Corp.
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Official Creditors Committee of Fox Markets v. Ely, 337 F.2d 461 (9th Cir. 1964) cert. denied 380 U.S. 978 , 85 S.Ct. 1342 , 14 L.Ed.2d 272 (1965), where the court stated that in cases where fees are sought by officers of the Court, “the time element is of major importance, although there are other factors which may be given consideration”, Id. at 465.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Galamison
v.
New York
No. 990.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1965.
380 U.S. 977
William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, William H. Booth, Stanley Faulkner, Paul O’Dwyer, Leon Quat, Oliver C. Sutton, Percy Sutton, Philip Roache and Charles T. McKinney for petitioners. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Mortimer Sattler, Assistant Attorney General, Frank D. O’Connor, Isidore Dollinger, Harvey B. Ehrlich, Irving Anolik, Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard TJviller for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.