Lam Tat Sin v. Esperdy, 379 U.S. 901 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Lam Tat Sin v. Esperdy, 379 U.S. 901 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kalvar Corporation v. Xidex Corporation (ca9, 1977-07-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Kalvar Corporation v. Xidex Corporation
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Superior Industries, Inc., 332 F.2d 473, 484-85 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 901 , 85 S.Ct. 190 , 13 L.Ed.2d 175 (1964).
cited Cited "see" St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary, St. Regis Paper Company v. Royal Industries, and Plas-Ties Subsidiary
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Superior Industries, Inc., 332 F.2d 473, 482 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 901 , 85 S.Ct. 190 , 13 L.Ed.2d 175 (1964).
cited Cited "see" Yeung Ying Cheung v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
3rd Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lam Tat Sin v. Esperdy, 334 F.2d 999 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 379 U.S. 901 , 85 S.Ct. 190 , 13 L.Ed.2d 176 (1964) wherein a similar practice was engaged. .
discussed Cited "see" No. 17182
3rd Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lam Tat Sin v. Esperdy, 334 F.2d 999 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 379 U.S. 901 , 85 S.Ct. 190 , 13 L.Ed.2d 176 (1964) wherein a similar practice was engaged 3 Sections 244(a)(1) and (f) provide: 'As hereinafter prescribed in this section, the Attorney General may, in his discretion, suspend deportation and adjust the status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, in the case of an alien who applies to the Attorney General for suspension of deportation and-- '(1) is deportable under any law of the United States except the provisions specified in paragraph (2) of this subsec…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Menzies
Utah · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., In re Bunker Hill Urban Renewal Project IB, 389 P.2d 538, 552 (upheld actions of redevelopment agency though one of its members ineligible because not resident of proper city), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 28 , 85 S.Ct. 190 , 13 L.Ed.2d 173 (1964); People v. Montoya, 44 Colo. App. 234 , 616 P.2d 156, 162 (1980) (upheld action of special prosecutor who was ineligible because member of attorney general’s office); Olathe Hospital Found., Inc. v. Extendicare, Inc., 217 Kan. 546 , 539 P.2d 1, 12 (1975) (upheld action of appeals panel though some of panel members' terms had expired); Marshall…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lam Tat Sin
v.
Esperdy, District Director, Immigration And Naturalization Service
No. 414.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1964.
379 U.S. 901
Ahraham Lebenkoff for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney. General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for respondent.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.