green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Pinkham v. Sara Lee Corp.
See Neal v. Thomas Organ Co., 325 F.2d 978 (9th Cir.1963), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 828 , 85 S.Ct. 55 , 13 L.Ed.2d 37 (1964); Trebonik v. Grossman Music Corp., 305 F.Supp. 339, 351 (N.D.Ohio 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mary Ellen Pinkham v. Sara Lee Corporation Hanes Hosiery, Inc. L'Eggs Products, Inc. Camex, Inc. Jay Columbus Victor Benedetto v. Mary Ellen Enterprises, Inc. Third Party-Defendant-Appellee v. Sara Lee Corporation Hanes Hosiery, Inc. L'Eggs Products, Inc., Third Party-Plaintiff-Appellant. Mary Ellen Pinkham v. Sara Lee Corporation Hanes Hosiery, Inc. L'Eggs Products, Inc. Camex, Inc. Jay Columbus Victor Benedetto, Sara Lee Corporation Hanes Hosiery, Inc. L'Eggs Products, Inc., Third Party-Plaintiffs v. Mary Ellen Enterprises, Inc., Third Party-Defendant. Mary Ellen Pinkham v. Sara Lee Corporation Hanes Hosiery, Inc. L'Eggs Products, Inc. Camex, Inc. Jay Columbus Victor Benedetto, Sara Lee Corporation Hanes Hosiery, Inc. L'Eggs Products, Inc., Third Party-Plaintiffs v. Mary Ellen Enterprises, Inc., Third Party-Defendant
See Neal v. Thomas Organ Co., 325 F.2d 978 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 828 , 85 S.Ct. 55 , 13 L.Ed.2d 37 (1964); Trebonik v. Grossman Music Corp., 305 F.Supp. 339, 351 (N.D.Ohio 1969). 68 Camex next argues that the copyright notice was defective because it was improperly placed on the page preceding the title page of the 1976 edition.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fisher v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. of New York (In Re MacFarlane Webster Associates)
Dinerman, 301 F.2d at 466; 3 Collier ¶ 59.36; see also In re Thomas, 211 F.Supp. 187, 191 (D.Colo.1962), aff'd per curiam sub nom Thomas v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co., 327 F.2d 667 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 827 , 85 S.Ct. 55 , 13 L.Ed.2d 36 (1964); In re Acorn Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Olaf C. Akland, and Bertha A. Akland v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
In contrast, we must uphold the tax court unless we are left with the definite and firm conviction, Baumgardner v. Commissioner, 251 F.2d 311, 313 (9th Cir.1957), that there was no clear and convincing evidence of fraud, id. at 322 ; see also Mensik v. Commissioner, 328 F.2d 147, 150 (7th Cir.) (“[c]ivil fraud need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 827 , 85 S.Ct. 55 , 13 L.Ed.2d 37 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Independence Tube Corp. v. Copperweld Corp.
See also Neal v. Thomas Organ Co., 325 F.2d 978 (9th Cir. 1963), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 828 , 85 S.Ct. 55 , 13 L.Ed.2d 37 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mensik et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 186.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
Kinsey T. James for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer, Meyer Roth-wacks and Carolyn R. Just for respondént.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.