Pierre v. Jordan, 379 U.S. 974 (1965). · Go Syfert
Pierre v. Jordan, 379 U.S. 974 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
95 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nunez v. Goord (nysd, 2001-10-23)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Nunez v. Goord
S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Leonhard, v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980) (citing Robins v. Rarback, 325 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.1963), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 670 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965); 5 C.
examined Cited "see" Center for Nuclear Responsibility, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (4×)
D.C. Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1964) (holding that the plaintiff "was entitled to conclude that the district court regarded the motion as timely....
discussed Cited "see" Bestway Equipment Services, Inc. v. Berwind Lines, Inc., Third Party v. Caribe Tug Corporation, Third Party
1st Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Croft-Mullins Electric Co., 333 F.2d 772 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965) (appellate court may properly find that prior or contemporaneous oral conversations and negotiations, though admitted without objection in a judge-tried case, are simply immaterial and irrelevant to the question of what the agreement was); 4 Williston on Contracts § 631 (3d ed. 1961).
discussed Cited "see" Winnie Ruth Motteler v. J. A. Jones Construction Company (2×)
7th Cir. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gonzalez v. Ocwen Home Loan Servicing
D. Conn. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980) (“[t]he district court has the power to dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim”) (citing Robins v. Rarback, 325 F.2d 929 [, 930] (2d Cir.1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 670 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965)); Mallard v. U.S. District Court for Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 307-08 , 109 S.Ct. 1814 , 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989) (although in the context of in fonna pauperis proceedings, a particular statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d), “authorizes courts to dismiss a ‘frivolous or malicious…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Merced Hernandez-Rivera and Carlota Garcia-Vasquez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2×)
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
A. Jones Construction Company, 447 F.2d 954 (7th Cir. 1971); See also Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1964) cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965); 9 J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reed Enterprises v. The Honorable Howard F. Corcoran, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Milton Luros v. The Honorable John J. Sirica, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1965 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Pierre v. Jordan, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965). 5 13 Petitioners allege that the multiplicity of legal proceedings which the Government intends to bring will destroy their businesses, exhaust their financial resources, and make it impossible to defend themselves.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reed Enterprises v. Corcoran (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1965 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Pierre v. Jordan, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965). 5 Petitioners allege that the multiplicity of legal proceedings which the Government intends to bring will destroy their businesses, exhaust their financial resources, and make it impossible to defend themselves.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pierre
v.
Jordan, Secretary of State of California
No. 641.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
379 U.S. 974
Petitioners pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Burton J. Gindler and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorneys General, and Harold W. Kennedy for respondents.
Cited by 46 opinions  |  Published

Motion of petitioners to strike respondents' brief denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.