How cited: Pierre v. Jordan · Go Syfert

Pierre v. Jordan (1965)

green · 95 citation events across 26 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196519952026
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1964) (holding that the plaintiff "was entitled to conclude that the district court regarded the motion as timely....
holding that the plaintiff "was entitled to conclude that the district court regarded the motion as timely.... This being the case, unique circumstances exist requiring that her motion be regarded as ... effectively terminating the running of the time for appeal."
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
A. Jones Construction Company, 447 F.2d 954 (7th Cir. 1971); See also Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951 (9th Cir. 1964) cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965); 9 J.
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Pierre v. Jordan, 333 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965).
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare · 2 citations in this opinion
Compare Pierre v. Jordan, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965). 5 13 Petitioners allege that the multiplicity of legal proceedings which the Government intends to bring will destroy their businesses, exhaust their financial resources, and make it impossible to defend themselves.
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare · 2 citations in this opinion
Compare Pierre v. Jordan, 9 Cir., 333 F.2d 951, 956-957 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965). 5 Petitioners allege that the multiplicity of legal proceedings which the Government intends to bring will destroy their businesses, exhaust their financial resources, and make it impossible to defend themselves.
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Croft-Mullins Electric Co., 333 F.2d 772 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 968 , 85 S.Ct. 664 , 13 L.Ed.2d 561 (1965) (appellate court may properly find that prior or contemporaneous oral conversations and negotiations, though admitted without objection in a judge-tried case, are simply immaterial and irrelevant to the question of what the agreement was); 4 Williston on Contracts § 631 (3d ed. 1961).
appellate court may properly find that prior or contemporaneous oral conversations and negotiations, though admitted without objection in a judge-tried case, are simply immaterial and irrelevant to the question of what the agreement was
Cited (see also) · D. Conn. · signal: see also
See also Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980) (“[t]he district court has the power to dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim”) (citing Robins v. Rarback, 325 F.2d 929 [, 930] (2d Cir.1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 670 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965)); Mallard v. U.S. District Court for Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 307-08 , 109 S.Ct. 1814 , 104 L.Ed.2d 318 (1989) (although in the context of in fonna pauperis …
green Nunez v. Goord (2001)
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Leonhard, v. United States, 633 F.2d 599 , 609 n. 11 (2d Cir.1980) (citing Robins v. Rarback, 325 F.2d 929 (2d Cir.1963), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 974 , 85 S.Ct. 670 , 13 L.Ed.2d 565 (1965); 5 C.