Sheffield v. Brooks, 379 U.S. 969 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Sheffield v. Brooks, 379 U.S. 969 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the scope of the injunction is not limited sufficiently to prevent infringement of the rights that does have____”
17 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gemveto Jewelry Company, Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Incorporated and Jeff Cooper, Individually (cafc, 1986-09-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Gemveto Jewelry Company, Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Incorporated and Jeff Cooper, Individually
Fed. Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the scope of the injunction is not limited sufficiently to prevent infringement of the rights that does have____
cited Cited "see, e.g." Benson v. RMJ Securities Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Globe Slicing Machine Co. v. Hasner, 333 F.2d 413, 415 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 969 , 85 S.Ct. 666 , 13 L.Ed.2d 562 (1965); Martin v. Graybar Elec.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sheffield
v.
Brooks, Sheriff
No. 651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
379 U.S. 969
Thurman Arnold, Stuart J. Land, Hume Cofer and John D. Gofer for petitioner..
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari.denied.