green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.5 score
“the words in the statute 'other than a bank' clearly show the intention of congress not to require a bank acquiring the assets of another bank to obtain board approval”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Marshall & Ilsley Corporation v. John G. Heimann, Comptroller of the Currency of the United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
the words in the statute 'other than a bank' clearly show the intention of congress not to require a bank acquiring the assets of another bank to obtain board approval
discussed
Cited "see"
Sylvester Marx v. Centran Corporation
See State of South Dakota v. National Bank of South Dakota, 335 F.2d 444 (8th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 970 , 85 S.Ct. 667 , 13 L.Ed.2d 562 (1965); Quaker City National Bank v. Hartley, 533 F.Supp. 126 (S.D.Ohio 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vial v. First Commerce Corp.
See also South Dakota v. National Bank of South Dakota, 335 F.2d 444, 448-49 (8th Cir.1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 970 , 85 S.Ct. 667 , 13 L.Ed.2d 562 (1965), wherein the Court stated, “The words in the statute ‘other than a bank’ clearly show the intention of Congress not to require a bank acquiring the assets of another bank to obtain Board approval.” Finally, it should be noted that the Federal Reserve Board has in this case, as in *659 the above-cited cases, been apprised of the details of the proposed transaction and has explicitly stated to the defendant banks as well as to plain…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hershey et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 656.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
Bernard B. Laven for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Melva M.-Graney for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.