green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Ruff v. Hodel
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808, 813 (E.D.Wash.1965), aff 'd 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Larry E. Ruff v. Donald Hodel, Secretary of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808, 813 (E.D.Wash.1965), aff'd 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Crawford v. Andrus
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808 (E.D.Wash.1965), affirmed 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966) and Eskra v. Morton, 524 F.2d 9 (7th Cir., 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Craig Decker, United States of America v. Raymond W. Marriott
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, 244 F.Supp. 808 , 814 n.13 (E.D.Wash.1965), aff’d, 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bigheart v. Pappan
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, D.C., 244 F.Supp. 808 , aff'd 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 ; Blanset v. Cardin, 256 U.S. 319 , 41 S.Ct. 519 , 65 L.Ed. 950 ; Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Probst, 428 F.2d 491 , rehearing denied 428 F.2d 498 (10th Cir.); Groundhog v. Keller, 442 F.2d 674 (10th Cir.). 10 As for appellant's contention that she was not given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the question of whether or not she was of Indian blood and met the requirements of section 7 of the Act of February 27, 1925, we hold that appellant's counsel properl…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bigheart v. Pappan
See Simmons v. Eagle Seelatsee, D.C., 244 F.Supp. 808 , aff’d 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 ; Blanset v. Cardin, 256 U.S. 319 , 41 S.Ct. 519 , 65 L.Ed. 950 ; Ute Indian Tribe of Uintah & Ouray Reservation v. Probst, 428 F.2d 491 , rehearing denied 428 F.2d 498 (10th Cir.); Groundhog v. Keller, 442 F.2d 674 (10th Cir.).
cited
Cited "see"
George Groundhog v. W. W. Keeler
See Simmons et al. v. Eagle Seelatsee, Chairman of the Yakima Tribal Council, et al., 384 U.S. 209 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 480 . 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Dell Publications, Inc.
(2×)
See Gent v. Arkansas, 384 U.S. 937 , 86 S. Ct. 1454 ; Redrup v. New York, 384 U.S. 916 , 86 S. Ct. 1362 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,167 William F. Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., John Burlington, and Glenn Andersen
See, e. g., SEC v. Latta, 250 F.Supp. 170 (N.D.Cal.), affirmed per curiam, 356 F.2d 103 (9th Cir. 1965), certiorari denied, 384 U.S. 940 , 86 S.Ct. 1459 , 16 L.Ed.2d 539 (contracts to assign undivided distributive shares in a decedent’s estate in event of recovery); SEC v. Bill Willoughby Coin Exchange.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Senfour Investment Co., Inc.
v.
King County
v.
King County
No. 1141.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 1966.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Wash. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.