McFaddin Express, Inc. v. Adley Corp., 382 U.S. 912 (1965). · Go Syfert
McFaddin Express, Inc. v. Adley Corp., 382 U.S. 912 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Vincent J. Ricciardi, United States of America v. Stanley M. Unger (ca2, 1966-05-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Vincent J. Ricciardi, United States of America v. Stanley M. Unger (2×)
2d Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See NLRB v. Cross, 346 F.2d 165 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 86 S.Ct. 290 (1965).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pro-Ag, Inc.
D. Minnesota · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. “Vitasafe Formula M”, 226 F.Supp. 266, 278 (D.N.J.1964), rev’d on other grounds, 345 F.2d 864 (3d Cir.) cert denied, 382 U.S. 918 , 86 S.Ct. 290 , 15 L.Ed.2d 232 (1965) (holding vitamin and mineral capsules to be drugs because they are intended to affect the structure or function of the body).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Jaffe, The Judicial Enforcement of Administrative Orders, 76 Harv.L.Rev. 865, 885-86 (1963) 22 This is not a case, like United States v. Vitasafe Corp., 345 F.2d 864, 871 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 918 , 86 S.Ct. 290 , 15 L.Ed.2d 232 (1965), in which the defendant is placed " 'at the peril of a summons for contempt' without providing any guidelines for the carrying on of a future advertising program in a manner deemed appropriate by the District Court." Not only is the injunction at issue in the instant case sufficiently specific, but the Digest may also resort to the FTC's admi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McFaddin Express, Inc.
v.
Adley Corp.
No. 492.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1965.
382 U.S. 912
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.