Lillo v. United States, 382 U.S. 975 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
Lillo v. United States, 382 U.S. 975 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (cadc, 1982-02-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Newspaper Drivers v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn., 382 U.S. 374 , 86 S.Ct. 543 , 15 L.Ed.2d 423 (1966).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Newspaper Drivers v. Detroit Newspaper Publishers Assn., 382 U.S. 374 , 86 S.Ct. 543 , 15 L.Ed.2d 423 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lillo
v.
United States
No. 664.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 17, 1966.
382 U.S. 975
Frederic C. Ritger, Jr., for petitioners., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.