green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“dialectical perfection, metaphysical nicety, abstract inerrancy, are not expected or required of federal trial courts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.
dialectical perfection, metaphysical nicety, abstract inerrancy, are not expected or required of federal trial courts.
cited
Cited "see"
Rosemary Pye, Regional Director, Etc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 122
See National Maritime Union of Am. v. NLRB, 367 F.2d 171, 176 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Lajuan and Billy Wood v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
See Bryan v. Kershaw, 366 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); 19 C.
cited
Cited "see"
Still v. Hudson (In Re Hudson)
See Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Mooreman, 366 F.2d 686, 688 (9th Cir.1966) cert. den. 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 109 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. West Peachtree Tenth Corporation D/B/A One Tenth Street Apartments
(2×)
R.Civ.P.; see Bryan v. Kershaw, 5 Cir. 1966, 366 F.2d 497, 499 , cert. denied, 1967, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
See, e.g., Bryan v. Kershaw, 366 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); Smith v. Dravo Corp., 203 F.2d 369, 374-75 (7th Cir.1953); Imi-Tech Corp. v. Gagliani, 691 F.Supp. 214, 231 (S.D.Cal.1986); Syntex Opthalmics, Inc. v. Novicky, 214 U.S.P.Q. 272 , 277, 1982 WL 63797 (N.D.Ill.1982) ("[w]here the security lapses were not the cause of the misappropriation, those lapses should not be the basis for denying protection"), aff'd, 701 F.2d 677 (7th Cir.1983); Courture, "Independent Derivation and Reverse Engineering," at 623 (citing cases…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
See, e.g., Bryan v. Kershaw, 366 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); Smith v. Dravo Corp., 203 F.2d 369, 374-75 (7th Cir.1953); Imi-Tech Corp. v. Gagliani, 691 F.Supp. 214, 231 (S.D.Cal.1986); Syntex Opthalmics, Inc. v. Novicky, 214 U.S.P.Q. 272 , 277, 1982 WL 63797 (N.D.Ill.1982) (“[w]here the security lapses were not the cause of the misappropriation, those lapses should not be the basis for denying protection”), aff 'd, 701 F.2d 677 (7th Cir.1983); Courture, “Independent Derivation and Re-. verse Engineering,” at 623 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bryan, dba Trakwork Equipment Co.
v.
Kershaw Manufacturing Co.
v.
Kershaw Manufacturing Co.
No. 1018.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 13, 1967.
Howard J. Marsh for petitioners. Edward E.Crowell, Jr., for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir.' Certiorari denied.