green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Long v. American Red Cross
See Spahn v. Julian Messner, Inc., 18 N.Y.2d 324 , 274 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 221 N.E.2d 543 (1966), vacated on other grounds, 387 U.S. 239 , 87 S.Ct. 1706 , 18 L.Ed.2d 744 (1967); Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 47 Ohio St.2d 224 , 351 N.E.2d 454 (1976), rev’d on other grounds 433 U.S. 562 , 97 S.Ct. 2849 , 53 L.Ed.2d 965 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weeren v. Evening News Assn.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See GCR 1963, 117.3. [4] Compare these pleaded asseverations with the reasoning and result of Spahn v. Messner, 18 NY2d 324 ( 221 NE2d 543 ) (remanded for further consideration, Messner v. Spahn, 387 US 239 ( 87 S Ct 1706 , 18 L ed 2d 744). [5] That motion alone with affidavits for and against plus the stipulated appraisal by all 3 courts of "A Bell for Okinawa." Such was the properly exclusive record upon which the trial judge based his decision.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Welling v. Weinfeld
See, e.g., Spahn v. Julian Messner, Inc., 43 Misc.2d 219 , 250 N.Y.S.2d 529, 538-40, 543 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1964), aff'd, 260 N.Y.S.2d 451 , 23 A.D.2d 216 (1965), aff'd, 18 N.Y.2d 324 , 274 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 221 N.E.2d 543 (1966), vacated, 387 U.S. 239 , 87 S.Ct. 1706 , 18 L.Ed.2d 744 (1967) (trial court finding invasion of privacy where plaintiff was depicted in book as a war hero who earned Bronze Star and ‘raced out into the teeth of the enemy barrage’ — two of a multitude of characterizations that were utterly false and embarrassing to plaintiff).” Bueno, 54 P.3d at 902-903 . {¶ 40} Ultimat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Denver Publishing Co. v. Bueno
See, e.g., Spahn v. Julian Messner, Inc., 43 Misc.2d 219 , 250 N.Y.S.2d 529, 538-40, 543 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1964), aff'd, 260 N.Y.S.2d 451 , 23 A.D.2d 216 (1965), aff'd, 18 N.Y.2d 324 , 274 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 221 N.E.2d 543 (1966), vacated, 387 U.S. 239 , 87 S.Ct. 1706 , 18 L.Ed.2d 744 (1967) (trial court finding invasion of privacy where plaintiff was depicted in book as a war hero who earned Bronze Star and "raced out into the teeth of the enemy barrage"-two of a multitude of characterizations that were utterly false and embarrassing to plaintiff).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES
v.
MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. Et Al.
v.
MARSHALL & ILSLEY BANK STOCK CORP. Et Al.
1017.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1967.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Nathan Lewin, Howard E. Shapiro and Herbert G. Schoepke for the United States., Maxwell H. Herriott and Louis Quarles for appellees.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 46 opinions | Published
Per Curiam.
The judgment is reversed. Section 1.1 (e) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, 80 Stat. 241; United States v. First City National Bank of Houston, 386 U. S. 361.