green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.8 score
“insurer has the burden of establishing the defense of arson by either direct or circumstantial evidence"; "evidence of deliberate destruction is sufficient”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Travelers Insurance v. Namerow
insurer has the burden of establishing the defense of arson by either direct or circumstantial evidence"; "evidence of deliberate destruction is sufficient
cited
Cited "see"
Karahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Presidio
See United Electrical Contractors Assn. v. Ordman, 366 F.2d 776 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1026 [ 87 S.Ct. 753 , 17 L.Ed.2d 674 ].
discussed
Cited "see"
Al Mumford v. James M. Glover
See United Electrical Contractors Assn. v. Ordman, 366 F.2d 776 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1026 [ 87 S.Ct. 753 , 17 L.Ed.2d 674 ], The existence of even a small group of cases in which the Board would be unwilling or unable to remedy a union’s breach of duty would frustrate the basic purposes underlying the duty of fair representation doctrine.
discussed
Cited "see"
Port of Portland v. Island in the Columbia River
See Uhlhorn v. U. S. Gypsum Company, 366 F.2d 211 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. den. 385 U.S. 1026 , 87 S.Ct. 753 , 17 L.Ed.2d 674 (1967); Arkansas v. Tennessee, 246 U.S. 158 , 38 S.Ct. 301 , 62 L.Ed. 638 (1918); Louisiana v. Mississippi, 202 U.S. 1 , 26 S.Ct. 408 , 50 L.Ed. 913 ; 202 U.S. 58 , 26 S.Ct. 571 , 50 L.Ed. 934 (1906).
cited
Cited "see"
Sokolowski v. Swift and Company
See United Electrical Contractors Assn. v. Ordman, 366 F.2d 776 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1026 , 87 S.Ct. 753 , 17 L.Ed.2d 674 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arkansas Land & Cattle Co. v. Anderson-Tully Co.
(2×)
See also Uhlhorn v. United States Gypsum Co., 366 F. 2d 211 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U. S. 1026 , 87 S. Ct. 753 , 17 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Uhlhorn
v.
U. S. Gypsum Co.
v.
U. S. Gypsum Co.
No. 822.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1967.
Joe C. Barrett and Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., for petitioner., John M. Heiskell for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.