Barlow v. Texas, 386 U.S. 16 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Barlow v. Texas, 386 U.S. 16 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Salazar (nmctapp, 2018-02-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Salazar
N.M. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
Based on this delay, Defendant contends 13 that the delay violated his constitutional right to a speedy trial. 14 {6} The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, applicable to the 15 states through the Fourteenth Amendment, see Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 16 213, 222-23 (1967), provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall 17 enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial[.]” U.S. Const. amend.
cited Cited as authority (rule) State v. Lee
Wash. · 2017 · confidence medium
Id. at 85.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Vincent Caterino, United States of America v. James Caterino
9th Cir. · 1992 · confidence medium
Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 16, 24 (1967) (harmless error standard applies to alleged violations of right against self-incrimination).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Morris (2×)
Cal. · 1991 · confidence medium
To the contrary, we find that the cumulative effect of any conceivable errors, including those defendant contends to be of federal constitutional dimension, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt under the rule of Chapman v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 16, 23-24 [ 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 710 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 24 A.L.R.3d 1065 ], Defendant’s prearraignment statement, properly admitted in evidence, contains a full and voluntary confession to the crimes of robbery and first degree felony murder with the special circumstance of robbery.
discussed Cited "see" (PC) Patton v. Loadholt
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 16 547 , 553–54 (1967) ( “Few doctrines were more solidly established at common law than the 17 immunity of judges from liability for damages for acts committed within their judicial jurisdiction 18 ....”); see also Coleman v. Schwarzenegger, 2007 WL 4276554 (E.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Kirvin Barlow
v.
Texas
109.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 13, 1967.
386 U.S. 16
Alto B. Cervin for appellant., Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender and Charles B. Swanner, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
Douglas, Fortas, Spencer.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Fortas would reverse the judgment of the court below for the reasons stated in the opinion of The Chief Justice in Spencer v. Texas, 385 U. S. 554, 569.