green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
(Jurlique, Inc. v Austral Biolab Pty., 187 AD2d 637, 640 [2d Dept 1992], citing Laufer v Ostrow, 55 NY2d 305 [1982]; see, Frummer v Hilton Hotels Intl., 19 NY2d 533, 536 , cert denied 389 US 923 [1967].) Finally, plaintiff fails to allege or show that Commercial maintains offices or bank accounts in New York, solicits business in the State or maintains a telephone listing of employees within the State, or any other connection with the State sufficient to sustain long-arm jurisdiction over it.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jazini v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd.
See Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 101 F.3d 863, 865 (2d Cir.1996). 14 To establish that a subsidiary is an agent of the parent, the plaintiff must show that the subsidiary "does all the business which [the parent corporation] could do were it here by its own officials." Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int'l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 537 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , remittitur amended, 20 N.Y.2d 737 , 283 N.Y.S.2d 99 , 229 N.E.2d 696 , and cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Howard v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler
See Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int’l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 537 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 44 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 854 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967); Tokyo Boeki (U.S.A.), Inc. v. S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Itel Containers International Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Express Service, Ltd.
See Frammer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 537-38 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 44-45 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 853-54 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Forgash v. Paley
Hoffritz, supra, at 58 ; accord Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 43 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 853 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967); Bryant v. Finnish National Airline, 15 N.Y.2d 426 , 260 N.Y.S.2d 625 , 208 N.E.2d 439 (1965). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
McVan v. Bolco Athletic Co.
See Bailey v. DeQuevedo, 375 F.2d 72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 247 , 19 L.Ed.2d 274 (1967); Schwager v. United States, 326 F.Supp. 1081, 1085 (E.D.Pa.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Birmingham Fire Insurance v. Koa Fire & Marine Insurance
See World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U.S. 286, 295-96, 299 , 100 S.Ct. 559, 566-67, 568 , 62 L.Ed.2d 490 (1980). 3 KOA next attempts to argue that GESB “does business” in New York, but this argument can be rejected out of hand because GESB has clearly not “engaged in such a continuous and systematic course of ‘doing business’ here as to warrant a finding of its ‘presence’ in this jurisdiction.” Frummer v. Hilton Hotels, International, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 536 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 43 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 853 (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 26…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Air Florida, Inc.
See, United States v. Feaster, 376 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. *20 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 237 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Air Florida, Inc. v. National Mediation Board
As the Court stated, “the Act does not require a hearing when the Board itself designates those who may participate in the election.” Id.; see, U. S. v. Feaster, 376 F.2d 147 , 150 fn. 3 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 237 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaffee v. United States
See Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 , 100 S.Ct. 1398, 1417 , 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980). 8 In this respect, this case provides a more persuasive argument for not finding the defendants liable than Jaffee I, where we found the government absolutely immune. 36 Indeed, this court in Bailey v. DeQuevedo, 375 F.2d 72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 247 , 19 L.Ed.2d 274 (1967), found that the justifications for the immunity announced in Feres applied to suits brought against government officials in their individual capacity.
cited
Cited "see"
Jaffee v. United States
See Bailey v. DeQuevedo, 375 F.2d 72 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 247 , 19 L.Ed.2d 274 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barcelona Hotel, Ltd. v. Hadlow
It has not been shown that the foreign corporation transacted business in New York and that the cause of action arose from that business (CPLR 302, subd [a], par 1; see Frummer v Hilton Hotels Int., 19 NY2d 533 , cert den 389 US 923 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Wiltemp Corp.
See Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int'l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967); J.
cited
Cited "see"
Katz Agency, Inc. v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.
Defendant is doing business in New York through its present agent, who has an office here (CPLR 301; see Frummer v Hilton Hotels Int, 19 NY2d 533 , cert den 389 US 923 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Doris Trading Corp. v. SS Union Enterprise
See generally Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int’l, 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967); Bryant v. Finnish Airline, 15 N.Y.2d 426 , 260 N.Y.S.2d 625 , 208 N.E.2d 439 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Aquascutum of London, Inc. And Rodex of London, Ltd. v. S.S. American Champion, Her Engines, Etc. United States Lines, Inc., and W. Wingate & Johnston, Ltd., Metasco, Inc. v. S.S. American Chieftain, Her Engines, Etc. United States Lines, Inc., and W. Wingate & Johnston, Ltd., Metasco, Inc. v. S.S. Rubens, Her Engines, Etc., Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S.A., Agency Maritime International S.C., Belgian Lines, Inc. And N v. Arement Deppe S.A., Inc., and W. Wingate & Johnston, Ltd.
See Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 535-536 , 281 N.Y.S2d 41, 43, 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert, denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Aquascutum of London, Inc. v. S.S. American Champion
See Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 535-536 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 43 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holness v. Maritime Overseas Corp.
Olive were its subsidiary: “[A] foreign supplier of goods or services for whom an independent agency solicits orders from New York purchasers is not present in New York and may not be sued here, however substantial in amount the resulting orders” (supra, at 310-311; accord, Savoleo v Couples Hotel, supra, 136 AD2d, at 693 [“since the defendant * * * has done nothing more in New York than solicit business through independent agents, it is unfair to require it to defend a lawsuit in New York”]; compare, Frummer v Hilton Hotels Intl., 19 NY2d 533, 537 , rearg denied 20 NY2d 758 , cert den…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vendetti v. Fiat Auto S.P.A.
See also, Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 (1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967) (where a foreign corporation receives considerable benefits from within the forum state, it may not be heard to complain about the burdens placed on it by the forum state).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Andros Compania Maritima S.A. v. Intertanker Ltd.
See, e.g., Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int’l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 537 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 44 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 853 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967). 10 An entity will be a “mere department” of a parent corporation if it is so pervasively controlled that the corporate distinction is more formal than real.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
H. Heller & Co., Inc. v. Novacor Chemicals Ltd.
See, e.g., Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int’l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 537 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 44 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 854 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967); Tokyo Boeki (U.S.A.), Inc. v. SS Navarino, 324 F.Supp, 361, 366 (S.D.N.Y.1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Baldwin Hardware Corp. v. Harden Industries, Inc.
See also Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int'l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 536 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 43 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 853 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Artemide SpA v. Grandlite Design & Manufacturing Co.
Id. at 121 ; see also Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int’l Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967) (services performed by affiliate of defendant Hotel, including publicity work and making final room reservations, plus the fact that affiliate was run for the benefit of defendant, sufficient to confer jurisdiction); compare Miller, supra (foreign corporation was not “doing business” when independent agency solicited but could not confirm reservations on its behalf).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidenas AG v. Honeywell Inc.
See also Frummer v. Hilton Hotels International, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533, 538 , 227 N.E.2d 851, 854 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41, 45 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lámar v. American Basketball Ass'n
See also, Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Internat’l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967); Gelfand v. Tanner Motor Tours, Ltd., 385 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 996 , 88 S.Ct. 1198 , 20 L.Ed.2d 95 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pneuma-Flo Systems, Inc. v. Universal MacHinery Corp.
A non-resident defendant may subject itself to the personal jurisdiction of a New York court under CPLR § 301 if it does business in this State “. . . not occasionally or casually, but with a fair measure of permanence and continuity,” Tauza v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 220 N.Y. 259 , 115 N.E. 915 (1917); see also Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Inti., Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , remittitur amended, 20 N.Y.2d 737 , 283 N.Y.S.2d 99 , 229 N.E.2d 696 , cert. den., 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. Gordon & Breach, Science Publishers, Inc.
See also, Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Int’l, Inc., 19 N.Y.2d 533 , 281 N.Y.S.2d 41 , 227 N.E.2d 851 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 241 , 19 L.Ed.2d 266 (1967). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin Marietta Corp.
v.
Federal Trade Commission
v.
Federal Trade Commission
No. 452.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 23, 1967.
Terrence C. Sheehy and Clark C. Vogel for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Irwin A. Seibel, James Mcl. Henderson and Charles C. Moore, Jr., for respondent.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.