green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
ca6 1978
But see Gay Games, Inc. v. Smith, 132 F.2d 930, 931 (7th Cir. 1943). * * * " 16 Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55, 63-64 (6th Cir. 1966), Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967). 17 The District Court concluded that Spector was not legally responsible for any claims of unlawful racial discrimination which the plaintiffs or their class may have had against its predecessor Viking.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Wiggins v. Spector Freight System, Inc.
But see Gay Games, Inc. v. Smith, 132 F.2d 930, 931 (7th Cir. 1943). * * * ” Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 , 63 — 64 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Interfirst Bank-Houston, N.A. v. Quintana Petroleum Corp.
See Nowell v. Nowell, 408 S.W.2d 550 (Tex.Civ.App.—Dallas 1966, writ dism’d), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 53 , 19 L.Ed.2d 116 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin Luther King Junior Elementary School Children v. Michigan Board of Education
See Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55, 59-60 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Penick v. Columbus Board of Education
See Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Laufman v. Oakley Bldg. & Loan Co.
See, Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry Lee and Jim White, Cross-Appellees v. Miller County, Arkansas, Cross-Appellant
See also Nowell v. Nowell, 408 S.W.2d 550, 553 (Tex.Civ.App.1966) (writ dismissed), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 53 , 19 L.Ed.2d 116 (1967). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl W. Stotts v. Memphis Fire Department
See also Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55, 63-64 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 (1967). 11 The absence of adequate findings is highlighted in this case by our deferential standard of review.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bronson v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.
See also, Higgins v. Board of Education of the City of Grand Rapids, 508 F.2d 779 (6th Cir.1974), and Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 244 F.Supp. 572 (S.D.Ohio 1965), aff'd 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967) [Deal I]. (2) The Racial Containment Theory Under the “racial containment” theory, Plaintiffs postulate that the Suburban Defendants, as well as the other named Defendants, either singularly or collectively, are somehow responsible for containing blacks within the City of Cincinnati.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brody-Jones v. MacChiarola
See, e. g., Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55, 60 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
George Arthur v. Ewald P. Nyquist
See, e. g., Deal v. Cincinatti Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donald Davis, Jr., a Minor by His Mother and Next Friend Mrs. Sadie Davis v. School District of the City of Pontiac, Inc.
See also Deal v. Cincinnati Board of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (C.A.6) cert. den., 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 ; Northcross v. Memphis City Schools Board of Education, 420 F.2d 546 , aff., 397 U.S. 232 , 90 S.Ct. 891 , 25 L.Ed.2d 246 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lee v. Nyquist
Compare Green v. County School Bd., 391 U.S. 430, 440-442 , 88 S.Ct. 1689 , 20 L.Ed.2d 716 (1968) with Deal v. Cincinnati Bd. of Education, 369 F.2d 55 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 847 , 88 S.Ct. 39 , 19 L.Ed.2d 114 (1967), opinion on appeal after remand, 419 F.2d 1387 (6th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tometz v. Board of Education
(2×)
Ed. 2d 158 , 86 S. Ct. 241 ; Vetere v. Allen, (1965) 15 N.Y.2d 259 , 206 N.E.2d 174 ; see also Guida v. Board of Education of City of New Haven, (1965) 26 Conn. Sup. 121 , 213 A.2d 843 .) Similarly, the Federal courts which have considered the issue, including Deal v. Cincinnati Bocvrd of Education, (6th cir.) 369 F.2d 55 , cert. denied 389 U.S. 847 , 19 L.
AMP Inc.
v.
General Motors, Inc.
v.
General Motors, Inc.
No. 129.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
William J. Keating and Truman S. Safford for petitioner., Warren E. Finken and George E. Frost for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. C. P. A. Certiorari denied.