green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Alan Jeffrey Seidel
By adopting the rule enunciated in Granello and similar cases, we are thus agreeing with the modern view and one which accommodates the purposes of both Rule 8(b) and Rule 52(a), one which “avoid[s] a multiplicity of trials, where these objectives can be achieved without substantial prejudice to the right of the defendants to a fair trial,” the true purpose of Rule 8(b), as declared in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. at 131, n. 6, 88 S.Ct. at 1625.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis Floyd Ant
(2×)
See Brulay v. United States, 383 F.2d 345, 348 (9th Cir.) ("Neither the Fourth nor the Fourteenth Amendments are directed at Mexican officials and no prophylactic purpose is served by applying an exclusionary rule here since what we do will not alter the search policies of the sovereign Nation of Mexico.”), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986 , 88 S.Ct. 469 , 19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Molina-Chacon
See Brulay v. United States, 383 F.2d 345 , 349 n. 5 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986 , 88 S.Ct. 469 , 19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Newell
Compare Brulay v. United States, 383 F.2d 345 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 986 , 88 S.Ct. 469 , 19 L.Ed.2d 478 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arceneaux
v.
Pfister
v.
Pfister
No. 593.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1967.
W. Scott Wilkinson for petitioners., C. Ellis Henican and C. Ellis Henican, Jr., for respondent.
Black, Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.