green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Cox
See also Sabbath v. United States (9th Cir. 1967) 380 F.2d 108, 111 [cert. granted (1968) 389 U.S. 1003 [ 19 L.Ed. 598 , 88 S.Ct. 570 ]]; Hopper v. United States (9th Cir. 1959) 267 F.2d 904, 908 ; and People v. Feeley (1960) 179 Cal.App.2d 100 , 104 and 105 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 529 ]; but cf. Hair v. United States (1961) 289 F.2d 894, 895-897 [ 110 App.D.C. 153]; and Perkins, Criminal Law (1957) pp. 149-150.) 3 They further assert that only the outer door of a home is privileged against breaking by officers seeking to arrest an occupant, and that once the outer door has been peaceably entered an inn…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chan Kwan Chung
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
v.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
No. 637.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1967.
William H. Dempsey, Jr., Esquire, a member of the Bar of this Court, is invited to appear and present oral argument, as amicus curiae, in support of the judgment below., Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for.respondent.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari granted.