green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Acequia, Inc. v. Clinton (In re Acequia, Inc.)
Accord, e.g., Abramson v. Boedeker, 379 F.2d 741 , 748 n. 16 (5th Cir.1967) (“[I]f the transfer is avoidable at all by any creditor, it is avoidable in full for all creditors regardless of the dollar amount of the prevailing claim.”), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 563 , 19 L.Ed.2d 602 (1967); Bergquist v. Theisen (In re Theisen), 45 B.R. 122,126 (Bankr.D.Minn.1984) (“[0]nce avoid-ability is determined under state law, the transfer is entirely avoidable by a trustee in bankruptcy regardless of the amount of the creditor’s claim relied on by the trustee.”); Gennet v. Silver (I…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,068 in Re Acequia, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, Debtor. Acequia, Inc., an Idaho Corporation v. Vernon B. Clinton, and Rosemary Haley, Acequia, Inc., an Idaho Corporation v. Vernon B. Clinton Rosemary Haley
Accord, e.g., Abramson v. Boedeker, 379 F.2d 741 , 748 n. 16 (5th Cir.1967) ("[I]f the transfer is avoidable at all by any creditor, it is avoidable in full for all creditors regardless of the dollar amount of the prevailing claim."), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 563 , 19 L.Ed.2d 602 (1967); Bergquist v. Theisen (In re Theisen), 45 B.R. 122, 126 (Bankr.D.Minn.1984) ("[O]nce avoidability is determined under state law, the transfer is entirely avoidable by a trustee in bankruptcy regardless of the amount of the creditor's claim relied on by the trustee."); Gennet v. Silver (In re Harry…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Huntsville v. City of Madison Owens Crossroads, Town of Gurley, Town of New Hope, City of Triana, Town of Madison County Marshall County
Id. at 811-13, 106 S.Ct. at 3234-35 . “[A] complaint alleging a violation of a federal statute as an element of a state cause of action, when Congress has determined that there should be no private, federal cause of action for the violation, does not state a claim ‘arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.”’ Id. at 817 , 106 S.Ct. at 3237 ; see also Roecker v. United States, 379 F.2d 400, 407-08 (5th Cir.) (a claim that depends on state law which has been incorporated into a federal statutory program does not arise under the laws of the United States), cer…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.
v.
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor
v.
Wirtz, Secretary of Labor
No. 681.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1967.
Carl L. Shipley for petitioner., Solicitor General Gris-wold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander, Jack H. Weiner, Charles Donahue and George T. Avery for respondent.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.