Shapiro v. Thompson, 389 U.S. 1032 (1968). · Go Syfert
Shapiro v. Thompson, 389 U.S. 1032 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nathan S. Smith v. Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine Grimm (ca9, 1976-05-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nathan S. Smith v. Arthur R. Grimm and Jeannine Grimm
9th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Transocean Air Lines, Inc., 386 F.2d 79, 81 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1047 , 88 S.Ct. 784 , 19 L.Ed.2d 839 (1968) (judgment against the United States due to an attorney’s lien held barred by sovereign immunity).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kelly v. Wyman
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Thompson v. Shapiro, 270 F.Supp. 331 (D.Conn.1967), prob. juris, noted, 389 U.S. 1032 , 88 S.Ct. 784 , 19 L.Ed.2d 820 (Jan. 15, 1968); Smith v. King, 277 F. Supp. 31 (M.D.Ala.1967), prob. juris, noted, 390 U.S. 903 , 88 S.Ct. 821 , 19 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Marco Antonio Lopez-Hernandez v. United States
9th Cir. · 1968 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Lannom v. United States, 381 F.2d 858 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1041 , 88 S.Ct. 784 , 19 L.Ed.2d 833 (1968).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Burns v. Montgomery
N.D. Cal. · 1968 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Thompson v. Shapiro, 270 F.Supp. 331 (D.Conn.1967), probable jurisdiction noted, Shapiro v. Thompson, 389 U.S. 1032 , 88 S.Ct. 784 , 19 L.Ed.2d 820 (1968). 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shapiro, Commissioner of Welfare of the State of Connecticut
v.
Thompson
No. 813.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
389 U.S. 1032
Harold M. Mulvey, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant., Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Elizabeth Palmer, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from D. C. Conn. Motion of appellee for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Probable jurisdiction noted.