green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McINTOSH
See State v. Walker, 199 Kan. 508, 511 , 430 P.2d 246 (1967) (“There need be no accident in order for there to be reckless driving.”), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 870 (1968). “ ‘[T]o obtain a conviction for reckless driving under 8-1566 it is only necessary to establish that the vehicle was driven in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of others; in other words, under circumstances that show a realization of the imminence of danger and a reckless disregard or complete indifference for the probable consequences of such conduct.’” State v. Brueninger…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hill
See Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636, 643-44 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. National Society of Professional Engineers
Compare International Union of Elect’l, Radio and Machine Workers v. NLRB, 127 U.S.App.D.C. 303 , 383 F.2d 230 (1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 904 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pugh v. State
See, e.g., Patton v. State of North Carolina, 381 F. 2d 636, 643 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U. S. 905 , 88 S. Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Hoffman v. State, 20 Md. 425, 433 (1863); State v. Barger, supra, 242 Md. at 618-620, 635-636 ; Comment, Double Jeopardy, 75 Yale L.J. 262 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Jacob Bruce v. John W. Wingo, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
See also Patton v. State of North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth D. Tipton v. J. E. Baker, Warden
We note the rejection of the notion of waiver of the double jeopardy guarantee in the special circumstances involved in Green v. United States. 355 U.S. 184, 191-192 , 78 S.Ct. 221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 ; see also Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636, 645-646 , (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 , which supports appellant’s position on double jeopardy.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank MacKlin Jr. v. United States
Compare Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 . 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lemieux v. Robbins
See also Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U. S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
North Carolina
v.
Patton
v.
Patton
No. 884.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1968.
Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for petitioner. William W. Van Alstyne for respondent.
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.