green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“any reasonable doubt”
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Woodstream Corporation v. Herter's, Inc. And George L. Herter
(2×)
any reasonable doubt
discussed
Cited "see"
LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY v. United Mine Workers of America
See A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 383 F.2d 772, 777 (3rd Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 871 (1968) (noting the undesirability of determining the conscious objective of a union in obtaining the inclusion of a challenged provision in a collective bargaining agreement on a bare stipulation of facts which supplies no indication of purpose or intention beyond the language of the provision and the general bargaining history); cf. Collier v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers Local Union Number 101, 761 F.2d 600 , 602 (10th Cir.1985) (in § 8(b)(4)®, (ii)(B) action s…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Local 525
The test is whether "under all the surrounding circumstances, the Union's objective was preservation of work ... or whether the agreements ... were tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives elsewhere." Id. at 644 , 87 S.Ct. at 1268 . 16 Generally "[a]greements which limit the employer, here [Helmkamp], to subcontracting with businesses that recognize the union or have a union contract violate section 8(e)." Building Material, 669 F.2d at 764; accord A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 772, 777-78 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Local 8…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Chauffeurs Local 525
Generally “[agreements which limit the employer, here [Helmkamp], to subcontracting with businesses that recognize the union or have a union contract violate section 8(e).” Building Material, 669 F.2d at 764 ; accord A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 772, 777-78 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB, 546 F.2d 989 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 818 , 98 S.Ct. 56 , 54 L.Ed.2d 73 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Feather v. United Mine Workers of America
See A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 772, 777-778 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilkins
See Sciortino v. Zampano, 385 F.2d 132, 133 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 906 , 88 S.Ct. 820 , 19 L.Ed.2d 872 (1968); United States v. Barone, 311 F.Supp. 496 (W.D.Pa. *1375 1970); United States v. Johnson, 294 F.Supp. 190 (E.D.Pa .1968 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. United States
See Sciortino v. Zampano, 385 F.2d 132 (2d Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 906 , 88 S.Ct. 820 , 19 L.Ed.2d 872 (1968) ; of.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hugh R. Conway, George M. Lebosky, Robert Davidoff, Hugh R. Conway, in No. 17,369, George M. Lebosky, in No. 17,391
See Sciortino v. Zampano, 385 F.2d 132 (2nd Cir. 1967) (expressly declining to adopt the rule of Ross v. Sirica, supra), cert. den. 390 U.S. 906 , 88 S.Ct. 820 , 19 L.Ed.2d 872 (1968); United States v. Chase, 372 F.2d 453, 467 (4th Cir.), cert. den. 387 U.S. 907 , 913, 87 S.Ct. 1688 , 18 L.Ed.2d 626 (1967) ; United States v. Smith, 357 F.2d 318, 320 (6th Cir. 1966) ; United States v. Amabile, 395 F.2d 47, 53-54 (7th Cir. 1968) ; Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871, 887 (8th Cir. 1967), reversed on other grounds, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969) ; Bayless v. United States…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnson
See, Jaben v. United States, 381 U.S. 214, 220 , 85 S.Ct. 1365 , 14 L.Ed.2d 345 (1965), Rivera v. Government of Virgin Islands, 375 F.2d 988, 990 (C.A. 3, 1967), Sciortino v. Zampano, 385 F.2d 132, 133 (C.A. 2, 1967), cert. den. in 390 U.S. 906 , 88 S.Ct. 820 , 19 L.Ed.2d 872 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UMC Electronics Co. v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Foster Cathead Co. v. Hasha, 382 F.2d 761 , 766 n. 5 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 906 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 872 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael T. Earles v. Union Barge Line Corporation, Billy Leroy McNamer v. Union Barge Line Corporation
See also Friend v. Tropis Co., 382 F.2d 633 (4th Cir. 1967), cert, denied 390 U.S. 906 , 88 S.Ct. 820 , 19 L.Ed.2d 872 (1968) (implies that had static electricity in the hold emanated from the ship, the vessel would be unseaworthy, however, when the static electricity did not emanate from the ship but was caused by entry into the ship of an isolated unforeseeable causative agent from without the ship [as in Morales v. City of Galveston, 370 U.S. 165 , 82 S.Ct. 1226 , 8 L.Ed.2d 412 (1962)], there was no warranty of seaworthiness which had been breached by the shipowner). 38 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hasha
v.
Foster Cathead Co.
v.
Foster Cathead Co.
No. 892.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1968.
Jack W. Hayden for petitioners. James F. Weiler and Royal H. Brin, Jr., for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.